Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 32628360
- PMCID: PMC7433831
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3276
Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Liquid biopsy is a promising method in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous meta-analyses only focused on the diagnostic performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Therefore, we firstly evaluated the overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios, and area under curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic curve for all liquid biopsy methods, exosomes, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cfDNA were calculated, respectively. A total of 62 articles involving 18 739 individuals were included. Fifty-one articles were about cfDNA, five articles were about CTCs, and six articles were about exosomes. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.78), 0.89 (95% CI 0.88-0.90), and 0.9004, respectively. The sensitivities were 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.85), 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.80), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.75-0.77) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The specificities were 0.97 (95% CI95% CI 0.95-0.99), 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.87-0.89) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The AUC were 0.9772, 0.9037, and 0.8963 for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had great diagnostic value in detecting CRC, regardless of subtypes. Among all liquid biopsy methods, CTCs showed the best diagnostic performance.
Keywords: CTCs; cell-free DNA; colorectal cancer; exosomes; liquid biopsy.
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic value of various liquid biopsy methods for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(3):e18581. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018581. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32011436 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnostic accuracy of circulating free DNA for the detection of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.Cancer Med. 2019 Mar;8(3):1218-1231. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1989. Epub 2019 Feb 21. Cancer Med. 2019. PMID: 30791218 Free PMC article.
-
Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer: the potential of circulating miRNAs and exosomes.Transl Res. 2019 Mar;205:77-91. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 12. Transl Res. 2019. PMID: 30391474 Review.
-
Value of circulating cell-free DNA analysis as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 18;8(16):26625-26636. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15775. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 28460452 Free PMC article.
-
Multiplexed DNA Methylation Analysis in Colorectal Cancer Using Liquid Biopsy and Its Diagnostic and Predictive Value.Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021 Oct 3;43(3):1419-1435. doi: 10.3390/cimb43030100. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021. PMID: 34698107 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The role of exosomes in liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction.Int J Cancer. 2021 Jun 1;148(11):2640-2651. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33386. Epub 2020 Nov 24. Int J Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33180334 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prognostic value of extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s12094-025-03915-z. Online ahead of print. Clin Transl Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40205153 Review.
-
Pancreatic Cancer: Pathogenesis, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Gastroenterology. 2022 Aug;163(2):386-402.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.056. Epub 2022 Apr 7. Gastroenterology. 2022. PMID: 35398344 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening and identification of serum exosomal protein ZNF587B in liquid biopsy for ovarian cancer diagnosis.Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 15;14(4):1904-1913. doi: 10.62347/RBTM1834. eCollection 2024. Am J Cancer Res. 2024. PMID: 38726286 Free PMC article.
-
Potentialities and critical issues of liquid biopsy in clinical practice: An umbrella review.Transl Oncol. 2025 Feb;52:102172. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102172. Epub 2025 Jan 15. Transl Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39817953 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(3):145–164. - PubMed
-
- Berger BM, Parton MA, Levin B. USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi‐year interval testing. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(2):e77‐e81. - PubMed
-
- Uri L, Jason AD, Charles K, Robert ES. Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(2):418–432. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical