Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Aug;9(16):5699-5707.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3276. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

Yuzhou Zhu et al. Cancer Med. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Liquid biopsy is a promising method in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous meta-analyses only focused on the diagnostic performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Therefore, we firstly evaluated the overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios, and area under curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic curve for all liquid biopsy methods, exosomes, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cfDNA were calculated, respectively. A total of 62 articles involving 18 739 individuals were included. Fifty-one articles were about cfDNA, five articles were about CTCs, and six articles were about exosomes. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.78), 0.89 (95% CI 0.88-0.90), and 0.9004, respectively. The sensitivities were 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.85), 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.80), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.75-0.77) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The specificities were 0.97 (95% CI95% CI 0.95-0.99), 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.87-0.89) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The AUC were 0.9772, 0.9037, and 0.8963 for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had great diagnostic value in detecting CRC, regardless of subtypes. Among all liquid biopsy methods, CTCs showed the best diagnostic performance.

Keywords: CTCs; cell-free DNA; colorectal cancer; exosomes; liquid biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta—Analyses recommendation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(3):145–164. - PubMed
    1. Berger BM, Parton MA, Levin B. USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi‐year interval testing. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(2):e77‐e81. - PubMed
    1. Uri L, Jason AD, Charles K, Robert ES. Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(2):418–432. - PubMed
    1. Vatandoost N, Ghanbari J, Mojaver M, et al. Early detection of colorectal cancer: from conventional methods to novel biomarkers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142(2):341‐351. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heiss JA, Brenner H. Epigenome‐wide discovery and evaluation of leukocyte DNA methylation markers for the detection of colorectal cancer in a screening setting. Clin Epigenetics. 2017;9:24. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances