Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 30;12(7):1955.
doi: 10.3390/nu12071955.

Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Leonie Elizabeth et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

The nutrition literature and authoritative reports increasingly recognise the concept of ultra-processed foods (UPF), as a descriptor of unhealthy diets. UPFs are now prevalent in diets worldwide. This review aims to identify and appraise the studies on healthy participants that investigated associations between levels of UPF consumption and health outcomes. This involved a systematic search for extant literature; integration and interpretation of findings from diverse study types, populations, health outcomes and dietary assessments; and quality appraisal. Of 43 studies reviewed, 37 found dietary UPF exposure associated with at least one adverse health outcome. Among adults, these included overweight, obesity and cardio-metabolic risks; cancer, type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases; irritable bowel syndrome, depression and frailty conditions; and all-cause mortality. Among children and adolescents, these included cardio-metabolic risks and asthma. No study reported an association between UPF and beneficial health outcomes. Most findings were derived from observational studies and evidence of plausible biological mechanisms to increase confidence in the veracity of these observed associations is steadily evolving. There is now a considerable body of evidence supporting the use of UPFs as a scientific concept to assess the 'healthiness' of foods within the context of dietary patterns and to help inform the development of dietary guidelines and nutrition policy actions.

Keywords: NOVA; dietary patterns; food processing; health outcomes; obesity; ultra-processed food.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P.M. was co-author of an update of the NOVA classification [22], and has been co-author of published research using the classification, including one of the studies in this review [80], and stepped aside in the appraisal process of that article. All of the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow Diagram of Database Search and Article Eligibility (modified from PRISMA flow diagram [43,44]).

References

    1. Lawrence M.A., Baker P.I. Ultra-processed food and adverse health outcomes. BMJ. 2019;365:l2289. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2289. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costa C.S., Del-Ponte B., Assunção M.C.F., Santos I.S. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and body fat during childhood and adolescence: A systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21:148–159. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001331. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fardet A., Rock E. Ultra-processed foods: A new holistic paradigm? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019;93:174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.016. - DOI
    1. Poti J.M., Braga B., Qin B. Ultra-processed food intake and obesity: What really matters for health-processing or nutrient content? Curr. Obes. Rep. 2017;6:420–431. doi: 10.1007/s13679-017-0285-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silva Meneguelli T., Viana Hinkelmann J., Hermsdorff H.H.M., Zulet M.Á., Martínez J.A., Bressan J. Food consumption by degree of processing and cardiometabolic risk: A systematic review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020:1–15. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2020.1725961. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources