Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):44.
doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00322-1.

Clinical and prognostic value of tumor volumetric parameters in melanoma patients undergoing 18F-FDG-PET/CT: a comparison with serologic markers of tumor burden and inflammation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Clinical and prognostic value of tumor volumetric parameters in melanoma patients undergoing 18F-FDG-PET/CT: a comparison with serologic markers of tumor burden and inflammation

Christian Philipp Reinert et al. Cancer Imaging. .

Abstract

Background: To investigate the association of tumor volumetric parameters in melanoma patients undergoing 18F-FDG-PET/CT with serologic tumor markers and inflammatory markers and the role as imaging predictors for overall survival.

Methods: A patient cohort with advanced melanoma undergoing 18F-FDG-PET/CT for planning metastasectomy between 04/2013 and 01/2015 was retrospectively included. The volumetric PET parameters whole-body MTV and whole-body TLG as well as the standard uptake value (SUV) peak were quantified using 50%-isocontour volumes of interests (VOIs) and then correlated with the serologic parameters lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), S-100 protein, c-reactive protein (CRP) and alkaline phosphatase (AP). PET parameters were dichotomized by their respective medians and correlated with overall survival (OS) after PET/CT. OS was compared between patients with or without metastases and increased or not-increased serologic parameters.

Results: One hundred seven patients (52 female; 65 ± 13.1yr.) were included. LDH was strongly associated with MTV (rP = 0.73, p < 0.001) and TLG (rP = 0.62, p < 0.001), and moderately associated with SUVpeak (rP = 0.55, p < 0.001). S-100 protein showed a moderate association with MTV (rP = 0.54, p < 0.001) and TLG (rP = 0.48, p < 0.001) and a weak association with SUVpeak (rP = 0.42, p < 0.001). A strong association was observed between CRP and MTV (rP = 0.66, p < 0.001) and a moderate to weak association between CRP and TLG (rP = 0.53, p < 0.001) and CRP and SUVpeak (rP = 0.45, p < 0.001). For differentiation between patients with or without metastases, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed a cut-off value of 198 U/l for serum LDH (AUC 0.81, sensitivity 0.80, specificity 0.72). Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that both MTV and TLG were strong independent prognostic factors. TLG, MTV and SUVpeak above patient median were accompanied with significantly reduced estimated OS compared to the PET parameters below patient median (e.g. TLG: 37.1 ± 3.2 months vs. 55.9 ± 2.5 months, p < 0.001). Correspondingly, both elevated serum LDH and S-100 protein were accompanied with significantly reduced OS (36.5 ± 4.9 months and 37.9 ± 4.4 months) compared to normal serum LDH (49.2 ± 2.4 months, p = 0.01) and normal S-100 protein (49.0 ± 2.5 months, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Tumor volumetric parameters in 18F-FDG-PET/CT serve as prognostic imaging biomarkers in patients with advanced melanoma which are associated with established serologic tumor markers and inflammatory markers.

Keywords: 18F-FDG-PET/CT; Biomarker; Malignant melanoma; Overall survival; Tumor volumetric parameter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Konstantin Nikolaou received institutional research funds and speaker’s honorarium from Siemens Healthineers and is a scientific advisor of Siemens Healthcare Germany. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Bivariate correlation curves between serum LDH and whole-body TLG (rP = 0.62, p <  0.001), between serum LDH and whole-body MTV (rP = 0.73, p <  0.001) (b) and between serum LDH and SUVpeak (rP = 0.55, p <  0.001) (c)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Estimated overall survival in patients with MTV above the cohort’s median (42.8 ± 3.3 months) compared to patients with MTV below the cohort’s median (51.2 ± 2.7 months, p <  0.001), (b) in patients with TLG above the cohort’s median (37.1 ± 3.2 months) compared to patients with TLG below the cohort’s median (55.9 ± 2.5 months, p <  0.001) and (c) in patients with SUVpeak above the cohort’s median (39.9 ± 3.2 months) compared to patients with SUVpeak below the cohort’s median (54.1 ± 2.7 months, p <  0.001)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) Estimated overall survival in patients with elevated serum LDH (36.5 ± 4.9 months) compared to patients with normal serum LDH (49.2 ± 2.4 months, p = 0.01) and (b) in patients with elevated serum S-100 protein (37.9 ± 4.4 months) compared to patients with normal serum S-100 protein (49.0 ± 2.5 months, p = 0.01)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Duncan LM. The classification of cutaneous melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2009;23:501–513. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2009.03.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ribas A, Hamid O, Daud A, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Kefford R, et al. Association of Pembrolizumab With Tumor Response and Survival Among Patients With Advanced Melanoma. JAMA. 2016;315:1600–1609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, et al. Nivolumab in Previously Untreated Melanoma without BRAF Mutation. N Engl J Med. 2014;372:320–30. 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. - PubMed
    1. Hodi FS, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob J-J, Rutkowski P, Cowey CL, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1480–1492. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30700-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob J-J, Cowey CL, et al. Overall survival with combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1345–1356. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709684. - DOI - PMC - PubMed