Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 6;12(1):100.
doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00886-6.

Current status of development of methylation biomarkers for in vitro diagnostic IVD applications

Affiliations
Review

Current status of development of methylation biomarkers for in vitro diagnostic IVD applications

Olga Taryma-Leśniak et al. Clin Epigenetics. .

Erratum in

Abstract

A significant volume of research clearly shows that disease-related methylation changes can be used as biomarkers at all stages of clinical disease management, including risk assessment and predisposition screening through early diagnostics to personalization of patient care and monitoring of the relapse and chronic disease. Thus disease-related methylation changes are an attractive source of the biomarkers that can have significant impact on precision medicine. However, the translation of the research findings in methylation biomarkers field to clinical practice is at the very least not satisfactory. That is mainly because the evidence generated in research studies indicating the utility of the disease-related methylation change to predict clinical outcome is in majority of the cases not sufficient to postulate the diagnostic use of the biomarker. The research studies need to be followed by well-designed and systematic investigations of clinical utility of the biomarker that produce data of sufficient quality to meet regulatory approval for the test to be used to make clinically valid decision. In this review, we describe methylation-based IVD tests currently approved for IVD use or at the advanced stages of the development for the diagnostic use. For each of those tests, we analyze the technologies that the test utilizes for methylation detection as well as describe the types of the clinical studies that were performed to show clinical validity of the test and warrant regulatory approval. The examples reviewed here should help with planning of clinical investigations and delivery of the clinical evidence required for the regulatory approval of potential methylation biomarker based IVD tests.

Keywords: Biomarker; DNA methylation; Epigenetics; IVD; In Vitro diagnostics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the process of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) test development for clinical use. Parts a-e show stages of the test development from research studies (a) to clinical use (e), through technology development (b), analitical validation (c) and clinical validation (d)

References

    1. Portela A, Esteller M. Epigenetic modifications and human disease. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(10):1057–1068. - PubMed
    1. Deichmann U. Epigenetics: The origins and evolution of a fashionable topic. Dev Biol. 2016;416(1):249–254. - PubMed
    1. Chiarella AM, Lu D, Hathaway NA. Epigenetic control of a local chromatin landscape. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kristensen LS, Wojdacz TK, Thestrup BB, Wiuf C, Hager H, Hansen LL. Quality assessment of DNA derived from up to 30 years old formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue for PCR-based methylation analysis using SMART-MSP and MS-HRM. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:453. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joubert B, Felix J, Yousefi P, Bakulski K, Just A, Breton C, Reese SE, Markunas C, Richmond R, Xu CJ, et al. DNA methylation in newborns and maternal smoking in pregnancy: genome-wide consortium meta-analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(4):680–696. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms