Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 5:6:30.
doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.12.03. eCollection 2020.

Telehealth and indigenous populations around the world: a systematic review on current modalities for physical and mental health

Affiliations
Review

Telehealth and indigenous populations around the world: a systematic review on current modalities for physical and mental health

Aprill Z Dawson et al. Mhealth. .

Abstract

Approximately 370-500 million Indigenous people live worldwide. While Indigenous peoples make up only 5% of the world's population, they account for 15% of the extreme poor and have life expectancy that is 20 years shorter than that of non-Indigenous people. Access to healthcare has been identified as an important social determinant of health and key driver of health outcomes. Indigenous populations often face barriers to accessing healthcare including living in remote areas, lacking financial resources, and having cultural differences. Telehealth, the utililzation of any synchronous modality, including phone, video, or teleconferencing technology used to support the provision of long-distance health care and health education, is a feasible and cost-effective treatment delivery mechanism that has successfully addressed access barriers faced by vulnerable populations globally, however, few studies have included indigenous populations and the application of this technology to improve physical and mental health outcomes. This systematic review aims to identify trials that were conducted among Indigenous adults, and to summarize the components of interventions that have been found to effectively improve the health of Indigenous peoples. The PRISMA guidelines for reporting of systematic reviews were followed in preparing this manuscript. Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Scopus, and PsychInfo databases for clinical trial articles on Indigenous peoples and mental and physical health, published between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2018. Eligibility criteria for determining studies to include in the analysis were as follows: (I) ≥18 years of age; (II) indigenous peoples; (III) any technology-based intervention; (IV) studies included at least one of the following mental health (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, suicide) and physical health (mortality, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1C, cholesterol, quality of life) outcomes; (V) clinical trials. A total of 2,662 articles were identified and six were included in the final review based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. Three were conducted in the United States, one study was conducted in Canada, and two were conducted in New Zealand. Study sample sizes ranged from 20 to 762, intervention delivery times ranged from three to 20 months and utilized telephone, internet and SMS messaging as the type of technology. There is a paucity of evidence on the use of telehealth programs to increase access to chronic disease programs in Indigenous populations. This review highlights the importance of culturally tailoring programs despite the modality in which they are delivered, and recommends telephone-based delivery facilitated by a trained health professional. Telehealth has great promise for meeting the health needs of highly marginalized Indigenous populations around the world, however, at this point more research is needed to understand how best to structure and deliver these programs for maximum effect.

Keywords: Telehealth; indigenous; mental health; physical health; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2019.12.03). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for eligible article selection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bartlett JG, Madariaga-Vignudo L, O’Neil JD, et al. Identifying Indigenous peoples for health research in a global context: a review of perspectives and challenges. Int J Circumpolar Health 2007;66:287-307. 10.3402/ijch.v66i4.18270 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Subramanian SV, Smith GD, Subramanyam M. Indigenous health and socioeconomic status in India. PloS Med 2006;3:e421. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030421 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Bank. Indigenous peoples. Washington, DC, 2019, Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/indigenouspeoples
    1. United Nations Development Program. Ten things to know about Indigenous peoples, 2019, Available online: https://stories.undp.org/10-things-we-all-should-know-about-indigenous-p...
    1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Indigenous peoples: Health. 2019, Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/mandated-areas1/he...