Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Dec;109(12):1522-1530.
doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity

Sven Fikenzer #  1 , T Uhe #  2 , D Lavall  2 , U Rudolph  2 , R Falz  3 , M Busse  3 , P Hepp  4 , U Laufs  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity

Sven Fikenzer et al. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Due to the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, medical face masks are widely recommended for a large number of individuals and long durations. The effect of wearing a surgical and a FFP2/N95 face mask on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity has not been systematically reported.

Methods: This prospective cross-over study quantitated the effects of wearing no mask (nm), a surgical mask (sm) and a FFP2/N95 mask (ffpm) in 12 healthy males (age 38.1 ± 6.2 years, BMI 24.5 ± 2.0 kg/m2). The 36 tests were performed in randomized order. The cardiopulmonary and metabolic responses were monitored by ergo-spirometry and impedance cardiography. Ten domains of comfort/discomfort of wearing a mask were assessed by questionnaire.

Results: The pulmonary function parameters were significantly lower with mask (forced expiratory volume: 5.6 ± 1.0 vs 5.3 ± 0.8 vs 6.1 ± 1.0 l/s with sm, ffpm and nm, respectively; p = 0.001; peak expiratory flow: 8.7 ± 1.4 vs 7.5 ± 1.1 vs 9.7 ± 1.6 l/s; p < 0.001). The maximum power was 269 ± 45, 263 ± 42 and 277 ± 46 W with sm, ffpm and nm, respectively; p = 0.002; the ventilation was significantly reduced with both face masks (131 ± 28 vs 114 ± 23 vs 99 ± 19 l/m; p < 0.001). Peak blood lactate response was reduced with mask. Cardiac output was similar with and without mask. Participants reported consistent and marked discomfort wearing the masks, especially ffpm.

Conclusion: Ventilation, cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and comfort are reduced by surgical masks and highly impaired by FFP2/N95 face masks in healthy individuals. These data are important for recommendations on wearing face masks at work or during physical exercise.

Keywords: Cardiopulmonary; Exercise capacity; FFP2/N95; Surgical masks; Ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Fitting of mask and leakage test. Fitting of spirometry mask with sm (A1) and ffpm (B1) and the respective leakage tests with sm (A2) and ffpm (B2)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects of wearing a surgical mask (sm) and a FFP2/N95 mask (ffpm) compared to no mask on maximal power (Pmax), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), ventilation (VE) and overall discomfort. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. CDC (2020) Recommendation regarding the use of cloth face coverings, especially in areas of significant community-based transmission
    1. ECDC (2020) Using face masks in the community—reducing COVID-19 transmission from potentially asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic people through the use of face masks
    1. RKI Robert Koch-Institut: Mund-Nasen-Bedeckung im öffentlichen Raum als weitere Komponente zur Reduktion der Übertragungen von COVID-19. Strategie-Ergänzung zu empfohlenen Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen und Zielen (3. Update) Epid Bull. 2020;19:3–5. doi: 10.25646/673. - DOI
    1. WHO (2020) Advice on the use of masksin the context of COVID-19
    1. Xiao J, Shiu EYC, Gao H, Wong JY, Fong MW, Ryu S, Cowling BJ. Nonpharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in nonhealthcare settings-personal protective and environmental measures. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(5):967–975. doi: 10.3201/eid2605.190994. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types