Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Nov;40(11):2957-2967.
doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01479-1. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist for central serous chorioretinopathy: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist for central serous chorioretinopathy: a meta-analysis

Bilei Zhang et al. Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) for patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

Methods: The Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched up to February 2020, to identify the studies comparing the efficacy of MRA with placebo/observation or photodynamic therapy (PDT) for CSCR. The primary outcomes were maximal subretinal fluid height and central macular thickness (CMT). The secondary outcomes included subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Data of interest were extracted and analyzed by R version 3.6.0. The weighted mean difference and their 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the strength of the association.

Results: Ten studies including 284 affected eyes were involved, with 168 undergoing MRA treatment, 60 taking placebo/observation, and 56 receiving PDT. The pooling results showed that MRA was significantly more effective in resolving maximal subretinal fluid height (P < 0.01) and diminishing CMT (P < 0.01) than placebo/observation, while PDT could achieve significantly better CMT reduction than MRA (P = 0.03). For BCVA improvement and SFCT reduction, no statistical difference was detected among the groups of MRA, observation, placebo, or PDT (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: MRA is an effective therapy for the management of CSCR, which is only slightly inferior to PDT in terms of CMT reduction. For patients who could not afford PDT, MRA could function as an alternative treatment with acceptable efficacy and safety.

Keywords: Central serous chorioretinopathy; Meta-analysis; Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; Photodynamic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kitzmann AS, Pulido JS, Diehl NN, Hodge DO, Burke JP (2008) The incidence of central serous chorioretinopathy in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980–2002. Ophthalmology 115(1):169–173 - PubMed - DOI - PMC
    1. Yu J, Jiang C, Xu G (2019) Correlations between changes in photoreceptor layer and other clinical characteristics in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 39(6):1110–1116 - PubMed - DOI - PMC
    1. Liew G, Quin G, Gillies M, Fraser-Bell S (2013) Central serous chorioretinopathy: a review of epidemiology and pathophysiology. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 41(2):201–214 - PubMed - DOI - PMC
    1. Sartini F, Figus M, Nardi M, Casini G, Posarelli C (2019) Non-resolving, recurrent and chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: available treatment options. Eye (Lond) 33(7):1035–1043 - DOI
    1. Nicholson BP, Atchison E, Idris AA, Bakri SJ (2018) Central serous chorioretinopathy and glucocorticoids: an update on evidence for association. Surv Ophthalmol 63(1):1–8 - PubMed - DOI - PMC

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources