Hydration for health hypothesis: a narrative review of supporting evidence
- PMID: 32632658
- PMCID: PMC7987589
- DOI: 10.1007/s00394-020-02296-z
Hydration for health hypothesis: a narrative review of supporting evidence
Abstract
Purpose: An increasing body of evidence suggests that excreting a generous volume of diluted urine is associated with short- and long-term beneficial health effects, especially for kidney and metabolic function. However, water intake and hydration remain under-investigated and optimal hydration is poorly and inconsistently defined. This review tests the hypothesis that optimal chronic water intake positively impacts various aspects of health and proposes an evidence-based definition of optimal hydration.
Methods: Search strategy included PubMed and Google Scholar using relevant keywords for each health outcome, complemented by manual search of article reference lists and the expertise of relevant practitioners for each area studied.
Results: The available literature suggest the effects of increased water intake on health may be direct, due to increased urine flow or urine dilution, or indirect, mediated by a reduction in osmotically -stimulated vasopressin (AVP). Urine flow affects the formation of kidney stones and recurrence of urinary tract infection, while increased circulating AVP is implicated in metabolic disease, chronic kidney disease, and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
Conclusion: In order to ensure optimal hydration, it is proposed that optimal total water intake should approach 2.5 to 3.5 L day-1 to allow for the daily excretion of 2 to 3 L of dilute (< 500 mOsm kg-1) urine. Simple urinary markers of hydration such as urine color or void frequency may be used to monitor and adjust intake.
Keywords: Arginine vasopressin; Copeptin; Metabolic; Renal; Water.
Conflict of interest statement
ETP, JHB, AD, IG, AI, CM, IS, TV and MV are or were employed by Danone Research during the writing of this review. LEA, WCC, SAK, FL, HRL, OM, JDS, IT and FP have previously received consulting honoraria and/or research grants from Danone Research. No financial compensation was provided for the conception, drafting or critical revision of this manuscript.
Figures
References
-
- Johnson EC, Peronnet F, Jansen LT, Capitan-Jimenez C, Adams JD, Guelinckx I, Jimenez L, Mauromoustakos A, Kavouras SA. Validation testing demonstrates efficacy of a 7-day fluid record to estimate daily water intake in adult men and women when compared with total body water turnover measurement. J Nutr. 2017;147(10):2001–2007. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.253377. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Raman A, Schoeller DA, Subar AF, Troiano RP, Schatzkin A, Harris T, Bauer D, Bingham SA, Everhart JE, Newman AB, Tylavsky FA. Water turnover in 458 American adults 40–79 yr of age. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004;286(2):F394–F401. - PubMed
-
- Institute of Medicine (IOM) Dietary reference intakes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
-
- Manz F, Wentz A, Sichert-Hellert W. The most essential nutrient: defining the adequate intake of water. J Pediatr. 2002;141(4):587–592. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
