Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;45(4):939-967.
doi: 10.1111/disa.12452. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

The Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale: development and validation of an individual-level protection measure

Jennifer M First  1 , Mansoo Yu  2 , J Brian Houston  3
Affiliations

The Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale: development and validation of an individual-level protection measure

Jennifer M First et al. Disasters. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Given the increasing threat of disasters in the United States and elsewhere around the world, well-tested assessment tools that operationalise specific protective factors associated with adaptation and resilience to such events are needed. Consequently, the authors proposed, developed, and validated the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale (DARS) to measure five domains found to support adaptive responses in individuals exposed to disasters: physical resources; social resources; problem-solving; distress regulation; and optimism. The development and validation processes of DARS occurred across two studies: the first comprised construct development, item generation, and expert review, whereas the second involved a full validation evaluation of the psychometric properties of the scale in a sample of adults exposed to a disaster in the US (N=625). The results revealed that DARS had psychometric properties that support its use among adults experiencing a disaster. A discussion is presented on how the scale can be employed in both research and practice.

Keywords: disaster resilience; individual level; measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abramson, D.M. et al. (2015) ‘The resilience activation framework: a conceptual model of how access to social resources promotes adaptation and rapid recovery in post-disaster settings’. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. 42(1). pp. 42-57.
    1. Adger, W.N. (2006) ‘Vulnerability’. Global Environmental Change. 16(3). pp. 268-281.
    1. Adger, W.N. and K. Vincent (2005) ‘Uncertainty in adaptive capacity’. Comptes Rendus Geoscience. 337(4). pp. 399-410.
    1. Ahmad, S. et al. (2010) ‘Earthquake impact in a remote South Asian population: psychosocial factors and posttraumatic symptoms’. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 23(3). pp. 408-413.
    1. Bakić, H. (2019) ‘Resilience and disaster research: definitions, measurement, and future directions’. Psychological Topics. 28(3). pp. 529-547.

LinkOut - more resources