Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e206004.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6004.

Assessment of Health Care Exposures and Outcomes in Adult Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock

Affiliations

Assessment of Health Care Exposures and Outcomes in Adult Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock

Katherine Fay et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Current information on the characteristics of patients who develop sepsis may help in identifying opportunities to improve outcomes. Most recent studies of sepsis epidemiology have focused on changes in incidence or have used administrative data sets that provided limited patient-level data.

Objective: To describe sepsis epidemiology in adults.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study reviewed the medical records, death certificates, and hospital discharge data of adult patients with sepsis or septic shock who were discharged from the hospital between October 1, 2014, and September 30, 2015. The convenience sample was obtained from hospitals in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Emerging Infections Program in 10 states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Tennessee). Patients 18 years and older with discharge diagnosis codes for severe sepsis or septic shock were randomly selected. Data were analyzed between May 1, 2018, and January 31, 2019.

Main outcomes and measures: The population's demographic characteristics, health care exposures, and sepsis-associated infections and pathogens were described, and risk factors for death within 30 days after sepsis diagnosis were assessed.

Results: Among 1078 adult patients with sepsis (569 men [52.8%]; median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 53-75 years]), 973 patients (90.3%) were classified as having community-onset sepsis (ie, sepsis diagnosed within 3 days of hospital admission). In total, 654 patients (60.7%) had health care exposures before their hospital admission for sepsis; 260 patients (24.1%) had outpatient encounters in the 7 days before admission, and 447 patients (41.5%) received medical treatment, including antimicrobial drugs, chemotherapy, wound care, dialysis, or surgery, in the 30 days before admission. A pathogen associated with sepsis was found in 613 patients (56.9%); the most common pathogens identified were Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Clostridioides difficile. After controlling for other factors, an association was found between underlying comorbidities, such as cirrhosis (odds ratio, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.03-6.32), immunosuppression (odds ratio, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.81-3.52), vascular disease (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.10-2.15), and 30-day mortality.

Conclusions and relevance: Most adults experienced sepsis onset outside of the hospital and had recent encounters with the health care system. A sepsis-associated pathogen was identified in more than half of patients. Future efforts to improve sepsis outcomes may benefit from examination of health maintenance practices and recent health care exposures as potential opportunities among high-risk patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Dumyati reported receiving personal fees from Seres Therapeutics outside the submitted work. Dr Lynfield reported being a coeditor of a textbook on infectious disease surveillance and an associate editor of the American Academy of Pediatrics Red Book outside the submitted work. Dr Kainer reported receiving personal fees and nonfinancial support from the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Infectious Disease Consulting Corporation, Pfizer, and WebMD and nonfinancial support from the American Society for Microbiology, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

References

    1. Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, et al. ; CDC Prevention Epicenter Program . Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009-2014. JAMA. 2017;318(13):1241-1249. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.13836 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. . Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):486-552. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Novosad SA, Sapiano MR, Grigg C, et al. . Vital signs: epidemiology of sepsis: prevalence of health care factors and opportunities for prevention. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(33):864-869. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6533e1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hatfield KM, Dantes RB, Baggs J, et al. . Assessing variability in hospital-level mortality among US Medicare beneficiaries with hospitalizations for severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(11):1753-1760. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003324 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rhee C, Murphy MV, Li L, Platt R, Klompas M; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenters Program . Comparison of trends in sepsis incidence and coding using administrative claims versus objective clinical data. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(1):88-95. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu750 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms