Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture: A Randomised Open-label Superiority Trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial)
- PMID: 32636099
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.003
Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture: A Randomised Open-label Superiority Trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial)
Abstract
Background: Urethral stricture affects 0.9% of men. Initial treatment is urethrotomy. Approximately, half of the strictures recur within 4 yr. Options for further treatment are repeat urethrotomy or open urethroplasty.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of urethrotomy with open urethroplasty in adult men with recurrent bulbar urethral stricture.
Design, setting, and participants: This was an open label, two-arm, patient-randomised controlled trial. UK National Health Service hospitals were recruited and 222 men were randomised to receive urethroplasty or urethrotomy.
Intervention: Urethrotomy is a minimally invasive technique whereby the narrowed area is progressively widened by cutting the scar tissue with a steel blade mounted on a urethroscope. Urethroplasty is a more invasive surgery to reconstruct the narrowed area.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was the profile over 24 mo of a patient-reported outcome measure, the voiding symptom score. The main clinical outcome was time until reintervention.
Results and limitations: The primary analysis included 69 (63%) and 90 (81%) of those allocated to urethroplasty and urethrotomy, respectively. The mean difference between the urethroplasty and urethrotomy groups was -0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.74 to 1.02). Fifteen men allocated to urethroplasty needed a reintervention compared with 29 allocated to urethrotomy (hazard ratio [95% CI] 0.52 [0.31-0.89]).
Conclusions: In men with recurrent bulbar urethral stricture, both urethroplasty and urethrotomy improved voiding symptoms. The benefit lasted longer for urethroplasty.
Patient summary: There was uncertainty about the best treatment for men with recurrent bulbar urethral stricture. We randomised men to receive one of the following two treatment options: urethrotomy and urethroplasty. At the end of the study, both treatments resulted in similar and better symptom scores. However, the urethroplasty group had fewer reinterventions.
Keywords: Randomised controlled trial; Surgery; Urethral stricture; Urethroplasty; Urethrotomy; Voiding symptoms.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Comment in
-
Is Urethrotomy as Good as Urethroplasty in Men with Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Strictures?Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):581-582. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Aug 11. Eur Urol. 2020. PMID: 32798147 No abstract available.
-
Re: Beatriz Goulao, Sonya Carnell, Jing Shen, et al. Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture: A Randomised Open-label Superiority Trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial). Eur Urol 2020;78:572-80.Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):e22-e23. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Nov 2. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 33143950 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Amit Bansal, Ruchir Maheshwari, and Anant Kumar's Letter to the Editor re: Beatriz Goulao, Sonya Carnell, Jing Shen, et al. Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture: A Randomised Open-label Superiority Trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial). Eur Urol 2020;78:572-80.Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):e24-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.10.021. Epub 2020 Nov 18. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 33218824 No abstract available.
-
Re: Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture: A Randomised Open-label Superiority Trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial).Eur Urol. 2021 Apr;79(4):552. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.029. Epub 2020 Dec 5. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 33293080 No abstract available.
-
Trauma, and Genital and Urethral Reconstruction.J Urol. 2021 May;205(5):1507-1508. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001662. Epub 2021 Feb 24. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33625903 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
