Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 30:14:1073-1082.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S257454. eCollection 2020.

Experiences and Views of Medicine Information Among the General Public in Thailand

Kamonphat Wongtaweepkij  1 , Janet Krska  2 , Juraporn Pongwecharak  3 , Narumol Jarernsiripornkul  1
Affiliations

Experiences and Views of Medicine Information Among the General Public in Thailand

Kamonphat Wongtaweepkij et al. Patient Prefer Adherence. .

Abstract

Purpose: Written and electronic medicine information are important for improving patient knowledge and safe use of medicines. Written medicine information in Thailand is mostly in the form of printed package inserts (PIs), designed for health professionals, with few medicines having patient information leaflets (PILs). The aim of this study was to determine practices, needs and expectations of Thai general public about written and electronic medicine information and attitudes towards PILs.

Patients and methods: Cross-sectional survey, using self-completed questionnaires, was distributed directly to members of the general public in a large city, during January to March 2019. It explored experiences of using information, expectations, needs and attitudes, the latter measured using a 10-item scale. Differences between sub-groups were assessed, applying the Bonferroni correction to determine statistical significance.

Results: Of the total 851 questionnaires distributed, 550 were returned (64.2%). The majority of respondents (88%) had received PIs, but only a quarter (26.2%) had received PILs. Most respondents (78.5%) had seen medicine information in online form. High educational level and income increased the likelihood of receiving PILs and electronic information. The majority of respondents (88.5%) perceived PILs as useful, but 70% considered they would still need information about medicines from health professionals. Indication, drug name and precautions were the most frequently read information in PIs and perceived as needed in PILs. Three-quarters of respondents would read electronic information if it were available, with more who had received a PIL having previously searched for such information compared to those who had not. All respondents had positive overall attitudes towards PILs.

Conclusion: Experiences of receiving PILs and electronic medicine information in Thailand are relatively limited. However, the general public considered PILs as a useful source of medicine information. Electronic medicine information was desired and should be developed to be an additional source of information for consumers.

Keywords: attitudes; general public; medicine information; need and expectations; practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Raynor DK, Savage I, Knapp P, Henley J. We are the experts: people with asthma talk about their medicine information needs. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;53(2):167–174. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00126-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Saffar N, Deshmukh AA, Carter P, Adib SM. Effect of information leaflets and counselling on antidepressant adherence: open randomised controlled trial in a psychiatric hospital in Kuwait. Int J Pharm Pract. 2005;13(2):123–132. doi:10.1211/0022357056181 - DOI
    1. Hamrosi K, Dickinson R, Knapp P, et al. It’s for your benefit: exploring patients’ opinions about the inclusion of textual and numerical benefit information in medicine leaflets. Int J Pharm Pract. 2013;21(4):216–225. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00253.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmitt MR, Miller MJ, Harrison DL, et al. Communicating non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug risks: verbal counseling, written medicine information, and patients’ risk awareness. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;83(3):391–397. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knapp P, Raynor DK, Berry DC. Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2004;13(3):176–180. doi:10.1136/qshc.2003.009076 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources