Endoscopic sclerotherapy versus endoscopic variceal ligation: esophageal symptoms, complications, and motility

Abstract

Endoscopic sclerotherapy is an effective method for treating bleeding esophageal varices. However, a number of complications may limit its usefulness. A newly developed method for treating bleeding varices, endoscopic variceal ligation, that uses small rubber bands to occlude and eradicate the varices, may cause less damage to the esophagus. Twenty-eight patients (seven with no prior treatment, eight undergoing sclerotherapy, and 12 undergoing variceal ligation) were evaluated with a symptom questionnaire and esophageal manometry. The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures in the three groups did not differ. The percent LES relaxation was significantly (p = 0.04) less in the sclerotherapy group than in the untreated group. Contraction waves in the esophageal body were not different in amplitude, duration, and propagation speed in the three groups. There was no increase in the amount of heartburn after either form of treatment. Eight of the nine sclerotherapy patients had a stricture after treatment that required dilatation, whereas none of the ligation patients had strictures. We conclude from this that early in the course of sclerotherapy, stricture formation is common, but any long-lasting adverse effect on esophageal function is minimal. We also conclude variceal ligation therapy causes less esophageal dysfunction and has fewer local complications. Thus, endoscopic variceal ligation may be a safer and more easily tolerated alternative to endoscopic sclerotherapy.