Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;24(Suppl 2):105-118.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02968-6.

Impacts of a Home Visiting Program Enhanced with Content on Healthy Birth Spacing

Susan Zief  1 , John Deke  2 , Paul Burkander  2 , Andrew Langan  2 , Subuhi Asheer  2
Affiliations

Impacts of a Home Visiting Program Enhanced with Content on Healthy Birth Spacing

Susan Zief et al. Matern Child Health J. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to determine the impact of Healthy Families Healthy Futures (HFHF) enhanced with Steps to Success (STS). HFHF is a structured home visiting program for teen parents in Houston that focuses on improving parenting skills and preventing child abuse. HFHF enhanced with STS includes content and activities aimed to reduce repeat pregnancies within 24 months after the first child's birth.

Methods: The study team recruited 248 young mothers for the study, primarily through local health clinics and schools, and then randomly assigned them to either a treatment group that was eligible to participate in HFHF enhanced with STS or to a control group. The control group was not offered any other program through the study. Outcomes were measured by a survey administered 12 months after program intake, in five domains aligned with the program's logic model: (1) exposure to information related to program content, (2) contraception knowledge, (3) contraception use, (4) enhanced family functioning, and (5) child health and development. To estimate program impacts, we used ordinary least squares regression, controlling for demographics and baseline measures of the outcome variables, if available. We use both frequentist approaches (calculations of statistical significance) and Bayesian posterior probabilities to interpret the findings.

Results: HFHF enhanced with STS significantly (p < .05) impacted exposure to information on parenting and birth control, with effects of 20.8 and 15.4 percentage points, respectively. Using Bayesian posterior probabilities, there is an 85% chance that the program had a favorable effect on these outcomes. We also calculate a probability of 77% that the program had a favorable impact on long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use, but a probability of 89% that the program reduced knowledge of birth control pills; these two results were not statistically significant (p = .17 and .10, respectively).

Conclusions for practice: These findings are primarily favorable and consistent with the program content and goals. Smaller than anticipated sample sizes due to recruitment challenges increased the chances for random error to affect the ability to detect statistically significant differences on many of our other outcomes; Bayesian posterior probabilities can therefore aid in interpreting the impact estimates. More research of this promising model is warranted.

Keywords: Contraception; Expectant and parenting youth; Home visiting; LARC; Parenting; Teen parent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The evaluated Healthy Families Healthy Futures program combines aspects of Healthy Families America, an evidence-based home visiting program, which focuses on building parenting skills and preventing child abuse, and Steps to Success, which addresses contraception and healthy birth spacing
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Amrhein V, Greenland S, McShane B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature. 2019;567(7748):305–307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baldwin MK, Edelman AB. The effect of long-acting reversible contraception on rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: A review. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2013;52(4):S47–S53. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.10.278. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bayes T. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Biometrika. 1958;45(3–4):296–315. doi: 10.1093/biomet/45.3-4.296. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bumbarger B, Perkins D. After randomised trials: Issues related to dissemination of evidence-based interventions. Journal of Children’s Services. 2008;3(2):55–64. doi: 10.1108/17466660200800012. - DOI
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas Bermudez A, Kafury Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: A meta analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2006;295:1809–1823. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809. - DOI - PubMed