Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;44(7):e12871.
doi: 10.1111/cogs.12871.

Time and Singular Causation-A Computational Model

Affiliations
Free article

Time and Singular Causation-A Computational Model

Simon Stephan et al. Cogn Sci. 2020 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Causal queries about singular cases, which inquire whether specific events were causally connected, are prevalent in daily life and important in professional disciplines such as the law, medicine, or engineering. Because causal links cannot be directly observed, singular causation judgments require an assessment of whether a co-occurrence of two events c and e was causal or simply coincidental. How can this decision be made? Building on previous work by Cheng and Novick (2005) and Stephan and Waldmann (2018), we propose a computational model that combines information about the causal strengths of the potential causes with information about their temporal relations to derive answers to singular causation queries. The relative causal strengths of the potential cause factors are relevant because weak causes are more likely to fail to generate effects than strong causes. But even a strong cause factor does not necessarily need to be causal in a singular case because it could have been preempted by an alternative cause. We here show how information about causal strength and about two different temporal parameters, the potential causes' onset times and their causal latencies, can be formalized and integrated into a computational account of singular causation. Four experiments are presented in which we tested the validity of the model. The results showed that people integrate the different types of information as predicted by the new model.

Keywords: Causal attribution; Causal reasoning; Computational modeling; Preemption; Singular causation; Time.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahn, W.-K., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299-352.
    1. Bechlivanidis, C., & Lagnado, D. A. (2016). Time reordered: Causal perception guides the interpretation of temporal order. Cognition, 146, 58-66.
    1. Bramley, N., Gerstenberg, T., Mayrhofer, R., & Lagnado, D. A. (2018). The role of time in causal structure learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 44, 1880-1910.
    1. Bramley, N., Mayrhofer, R., Gerstenberg, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2017). Causal learning from interventions and dynamics in continuous time. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 150-155). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    1. Buehner, M. J. (2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23, 1490-1497.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources