Time and Singular Causation-A Computational Model
- PMID: 32638419
- DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12871
Time and Singular Causation-A Computational Model
Abstract
Causal queries about singular cases, which inquire whether specific events were causally connected, are prevalent in daily life and important in professional disciplines such as the law, medicine, or engineering. Because causal links cannot be directly observed, singular causation judgments require an assessment of whether a co-occurrence of two events c and e was causal or simply coincidental. How can this decision be made? Building on previous work by Cheng and Novick (2005) and Stephan and Waldmann (2018), we propose a computational model that combines information about the causal strengths of the potential causes with information about their temporal relations to derive answers to singular causation queries. The relative causal strengths of the potential cause factors are relevant because weak causes are more likely to fail to generate effects than strong causes. But even a strong cause factor does not necessarily need to be causal in a singular case because it could have been preempted by an alternative cause. We here show how information about causal strength and about two different temporal parameters, the potential causes' onset times and their causal latencies, can be formalized and integrated into a computational account of singular causation. Four experiments are presented in which we tested the validity of the model. The results showed that people integrate the different types of information as predicted by the new model.
Keywords: Causal attribution; Causal reasoning; Computational modeling; Preemption; Singular causation; Time.
© 2020 The Authors. Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Cognitive Science Society (CSS).
References
-
- Ahn, W.-K., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299-352.
-
- Bechlivanidis, C., & Lagnado, D. A. (2016). Time reordered: Causal perception guides the interpretation of temporal order. Cognition, 146, 58-66.
-
- Bramley, N., Gerstenberg, T., Mayrhofer, R., & Lagnado, D. A. (2018). The role of time in causal structure learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 44, 1880-1910.
-
- Bramley, N., Mayrhofer, R., Gerstenberg, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2017). Causal learning from interventions and dynamics in continuous time. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 150-155). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
-
- Buehner, M. J. (2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23, 1490-1497.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources