Favorable Outcomes of Liver Transplantation from Controlled Circulatory Death Donors Using Normothermic Regional Perfusion Compared to Brain Death Donors
- PMID: 32639402
- DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003372
Favorable Outcomes of Liver Transplantation from Controlled Circulatory Death Donors Using Normothermic Regional Perfusion Compared to Brain Death Donors
Abstract
Background: Liver transplantation (LT) from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) was initiated in France in 2015 under a protocol based on the use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) before organ procurement. The aim was to compare outcomes following cDCD LT with NRP and donation after brain death (DBD) LT.
Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study comparing cDCD LT with NRP and DBD LT. A case-matched study (1:2) was performed using the variables such as recipient and donor age, indication of LT.
Results: A total of 50 patients from the cDCD group were matched to 100 patients from the DBD group. From postoperative days 1-4, serum transaminase release was significantly lower in the cDCD group compared to the DBD group (P < 0.05). Early allograft dysfunction (cDCD: 18% versus DBD: 32%; P = 0.11), acute kidney injury (26% versus 33%; P = 0.49), 90-d graft loss (2% versus 5%; P = 0.66), and arterial (4% versus 12%; P = 0.19) and biliary (16% versus 17%; P = 0.94) complications were similar between the 2 groups. The 2-y graft survival was 88% for cDCD group and 85% for DBD group (P = 0.91). The 2-y patient survival was 90% for cDCD group and 88% for DBD group (P = 0.68).
Conclusions: This study provides evidence that cDCD LT following postmortem NRP can be safely and effectively performed in selected recipients with similar graft and patient survival outcomes, without increased rates of biliary complications and early graft dysfunction compared to DBD LT.
References
-
- Blok JJ, Detry O, Putter H, et al. Longterm results of liver transplantation from donation after circulatory death. Liver Transpl. 2016; 22:1107–1114. doi:10.1002/lt.24449 - DOI
-
- Kalisvaart M, de Haan JE, Polak WG, et al. Comparison of postoperative outcomes between donation after circulatory death and donation after brain death liver transplantation using the comprehensive complication index. Ann Surg. 2017; 266:772–778. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002419 - DOI
-
- Laing RW, Scalera I, Isaac J, et al. Liver transplantation using grafts from donors after circulatory death: A propensity score-matched study from a single center. Am J Transplant. 2016; 16:1795–1804. doi:10.1111/ajt.13699 - DOI
-
- Kollmann D, Sapisochin G, Goldaracena N, et al. Expanding the donor pool: donation after circulatory death and living liver donation do not compromise the results of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2018; 24:779–789. doi:10.1002/lt.25068 - DOI
-
- Cascales-Campos PA, Ferreras D, Alconchel F, et al. Controlled donation after circulatory death up to 80 years for liver transplantation: pushing the limit again. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20:204–212. doi:10.1111/ajt.15537 - DOI