Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;24(2):e13015.
doi: 10.1111/desc.13015. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

The visual array task: A novel gaze-based measure of object label and category knowledge

Affiliations

The visual array task: A novel gaze-based measure of object label and category knowledge

Kathryn M Hauschild et al. Dev Sci. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Visual attention measures of receptive vocabulary place minimal task demand on participants and produce a more accurate measure of language comprehension than parent report measures. However, current gaze-based measures employ visual comparisons limited to two simultaneous items. With this limitation, the degree of similarity of the target to the distractor can have a significant impact on the interpretation of task performance. The current study evaluates a novel gaze-based paradigm that includes an eight-item array. This visual array task (VAT) combines the theoretical frameworks of the Intermodal Preferential Looking Paradigm (IPLP) and looking-while-listening (LWL) methods of language comprehension measurement but using a larger array of simultaneously presented items. The use of a larger array of items and the inclusion of a superordinate category contrast may provide a more sensitive measure of receptive vocabulary as well as an understanding of the extent to which early word comprehension reflects knowledge of broader categories. Results indicated that the tested VAT was a sensitive measure of both object label and category knowledge. This paradigm provides researchers with a flexible and efficient task to measure language comprehension and category knowledge while reducing behavioral demands placed on participants.

Keywords: categorization; eye-tracking; infancy; language development; receptive vocabulary; visual array task.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: Kathryn M. Hauschild declares that she has no conflict of interest. Anamiguel Pomales-Ramos declares that she has no conflict of interest. Mark S. Strauss declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of visual stimulus projected on screen.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
System used to counterbalance target word presentation and category contrasts across the six stimulus sets.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Developmental trajectories of Average Target Fixation, Average Target-Category Fixation, and Average Other-Category Fixation for the longitudinal cohort. Error bars represent: 95% confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arias-Trejo N, & Plunkett K (2010). The effects of perceptual similarity and category membership on early word-referent identification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(1–2), 63–80. 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bayley N (1993). Bayley scales of infant development: Manual. Psychological Corporation.
    1. Brady NC, Anderson CJ, Hahn LJ, Obermeier SM, & Kapa LL (2014). Eye tracking as a measure of receptive vocabulary in children with autism spectrum disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(2), 147–159. 10.3109/07434618.2014.904923 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fenson L (2002). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User’s guide and technical manual. Paul H. Brookes.
    1. Ferguson B, & Waxman S (2017). Linking language and categorization in infancy. Journal of child language, 44(3), 527–552. 10.1017/S0305000916000568 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types