Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 20;63(7):2386-2402.
doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00259. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

The Relation Between Vocabulary Knowledge and Phonological Awareness in Children With Cochlear Implants

Emily Lund  1
Affiliations

The Relation Between Vocabulary Knowledge and Phonological Awareness in Children With Cochlear Implants

Emily Lund. J Speech Lang Hear Res. .

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relation between lexical knowledge and phonological awareness performance of children with cochlear implants. Method Thirty children with cochlear implants (aged 5-7 years), 30 children with normal hearing matched for age, and 30 children with normal hearing matched for vocabulary size participated in the study. Children completed a vocabulary knowledge measure and three phonological awareness tasks with words that had high and low neighborhood density. Results Children with cochlear implants performed more poorly than their age-matched peers and similarly to their vocabulary-matched peers on phonological awareness tasks. When performance was analyzed according to the neighborhood density of the target word, children with cochlear implants and age-matched children performed better with high-density words. Across all groups, vocabulary size correlated significantly with phonological awareness performance. Conclusion Children with cochlear implants demonstrate delays in both vocabulary knowledge and phonological awareness performance, but children with cochlear implants appear to take advantage of lexical information similarly to their age-matched peers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Phonological awareness performance by group and target neighborhood density.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ainsworth S., Welbourne S., & Hesketh A. (2016). Lexical restructuring in preliterate children: Evidence from novel measures of phonological representation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(4), 997–1023. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000338
    1. Ambrose S. E., Fey M. E., & Eisenberg L. S. (2012). Phonological awareness and print knowledge of preschool children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(3), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0086) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bobzien J. L., Richels C., Schwartz K., Raver S. A., Hester P., & Morin L. (2015). Using repeated reading and explicit instruction to teach vocabulary to preschoolers with hearing loss. Infants & Young Children, 28(3), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000039
    1. Brysbaert M., & New B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 - PubMed
    1. Catts H. W., Adlof S. M., Hogan T. P., & Weismer S. E. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1378–1396. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/096) - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources