Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 8;10(7):e038133.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038133.

Cardiac arrest as a reportable condition: a cohort study of the first 6 years of the Norwegian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry

Affiliations

Cardiac arrest as a reportable condition: a cohort study of the first 6 years of the Norwegian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry

Ingvild Beathe Myrhaugen Tjelmeland et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The Norwegian Cardiac Arrest Registry (NorCAR) was established in 2013 when cardiac arrest became a mandatory reportable condition. The aim of this cohort study is to describe how the world's first mandatory, population-based cardiac arrest registry evolved during its first 6 years.

Setting: Norway has a total population of 5.3 million inhabitants with a population density that varies considerably. All residents are assigned a unique identifier number, giving nationally approved registries access to information about all births and deaths in the country. Data in the registry are entered by data processors; public employees with close links to the emergency medical services. All data processors undergo a standardised training and meet for yearly retraining and updates.

Participants: All events of cardiac arrest where bystanders or healthcare professionals have started cardiopulmonary resuscitation or performed defibrillation are included into the NorCAR.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Since the establishment of the registry, the number of reporting health trusts, the number of reported events and the corresponding population at risk were followed year by year. Outcome is measured as changes in inclusion rate, incidence per 100 000 inhabitants and survival to 30 days after cardiac arrest.

Results: In total, 14 849 cases were registered over 6 years, between 2013 and 2018. The number of health trusts reporting rose steadily from 2013. Within 3 years, all trusts reported to the registry with an increasing number of events reported; going from 1101 to 3400 per year. The prevalence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation increased slightly, but the population incidence of survival did not change.

Conclusion: Declaring cardiac arrest as a reportable condition and close follow-up of all reporting areas is essential when building a national registry.

Keywords: cardiac arrest; cardiology; epidemiology; registry; reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: There are no competing interests to report for the submitted work. TMO reports grants from Zoll Foundation and grants from Laerdal foundation, outside the submitted work. TWL reports paid and unpaid consultant work for Lærdal Medical and the Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of Norway showing health trusts that report data to the National registry. Green: data collected the entire year, yellow: data collected for parts of the year, red: did not report.
Figure 2
Figure 2
All patients included in the registry. Left axis and bars: number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests treated by ambulance, by year of registration. Patients with EMS-observed collapse are identified as light grey. Right axis and lines: population incidence of ambulance treated arrests (blue), and population incidence of 30-day survival (green); per 100 000 inhabitants. EMS, emergency medical service.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Utstein comparator group (witnessed collapse and shockable first rhythm). Left axis and bars: number of cardiac arrest patients by year of registration. Patients with EMS-observed collapse are identified as light grey. Patients successfully resuscitated with AED before EMS arrival are orange. Right axis and lines: population incidence of the total Utstein comparator group (including EMS witnessed cases and those resuscitated before EMS arrival) (blue line), and population incidence of 30-day survival in the total group (green); per 100 000 inhabitants. AED, Automatic External Defibrillator; EMS, emergency medical service.

References

    1. Meaney PA, Bobrow BJ, Mancini ME, et al. . Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: [corrected] improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013;128:417–35. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829d8654 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hazinski MF, Nolan JP, Billi JE, et al. . Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 2010;122:S250–75. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970897 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Global Resuscitation Alliance Secondary global resuscitation alliance 2017. Available: https://www.globalresuscitationalliance.org [Accessed 21 Apr 2020].
    1. Gräsner J-T, Wnent J, Herlitz J, et al. . Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe - Results of the EuReCa TWO study. Resuscitation 2020;148:218–26. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.042 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beck B, Bray J, Cameron P, et al. . Regional variation in the characteristics, incidence and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Australia and New Zealand: results from the Aus-ROC Epistry. Resuscitation 2018;126:49–57. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.029 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources