Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 1:29:100572.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100572. eCollection 2020 Aug.

MINOCA: The caveat of absence of coronary obstruction in myocardial infarction

Affiliations

MINOCA: The caveat of absence of coronary obstruction in myocardial infarction

Nousjka P A Vranken et al. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. .

Abstract

Aims: Whether patients with MINOCA (myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries) have better outcomes than patients with obstructive coronary artery disease remains contradictory. The current study focussed on the clinical profile and prognosis of MINOCA patients.

Methods and results: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admitted to the Isala hospital in Zwolle, the Netherlands, between 2006 and 2014. A total of 7693 patients were categorized into three groups: MINOCA, single-vessel obstructive ACS (SV-ACS), and multi-vessel obstructive ACS (MV-ACS). MINOCA patients (5.2% of the total population) were more likely to be female (51.5% vs. 30.3% and 26.0% in SV-ACS and MV-ACS, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). The prevalence of risk factors in the MINOCA group was in between the SV-ACS and MV-ACS groups. Logistic regression revealed a lower odds of dying in SV-ACS (odds ratio (OR) = 0.70 (p = 0.04)) and a similar odds in MV-ACS (OR = 0.88, p = 0.45) compared to MINOCA.

Conclusions: Patients with MINOCA show an 'intermediate' risk profile with mortality rates in between those of both ACS groups. Hence, MINOCA should be recognised as a potential risk factor for mortality, requiring adequate treatment and follow-up.

Keywords: ACS/NSTE-ACS; Clinical research; MINOCA; STE-ACS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relation which could have affected the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cumulative crude all-cause mortality across groups at maximum follow-up. Abbreviations as in Table 1.

References

    1. Pasupathy S., Air T., Dreyer R.P., Tavella R., Beltrame J.F. Systematic review of patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries. Circulation. 2015;131:861–870. - PubMed
    1. Agewall S., Beltrame J.F., Reynolds H.R. ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:143–153. - PubMed
    1. Tamis-Holland J.E., Jneid H., Reynolds H.R. Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Myocardial Infarction in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e891–e908. - PubMed
    1. Pustjens T.F.S., Appelman Y., Damman P. Guidelines for the management of myocardial infarction/injury with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a position paper from the Dutch ACS working group. Neth. Heart J. 2020;28:116–130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharifi M., Frohlich T.G., Silverman I.M. Myocardial infarction with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Chest. 1995;107:36–40. - PubMed