Treatment outcome after radiochemotherapy in anal cancer patients staged with 18F-FDG-PET-CT
- PMID: 32642564
- PMCID: PMC7334798
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.06.008
Treatment outcome after radiochemotherapy in anal cancer patients staged with 18F-FDG-PET-CT
Abstract
Background: Anal cancer (AC) is a malignancy with increasing incidence and commonly treated with radiochemotherapy. Positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) has been shown to improve treatment outcome in various oncological diseases, however, for AC long-term outcome data is sparse. The aim of the present study is therefore to report outcomes in our cohort of PET/CT staged AC patients treated with radiochemotherapy.
Methods: Patients with AC who were treated with radiochemotherapy in curative intent were included in this retrospective study if a PET/CT scan was performed pre-therapeutically. Information from PET/CT was considered for nodal and primary target volume definition. Radiotherapy dose to the primary tumor was 50-66 Gy and concomitant chemotherapy included 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C. The uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was quantified using 50%-isocontour volumes of interests (VOIs) and measuring the standardized uptake value (SUV) and the metabolic tumor volume (MTV).18F-FDG uptake was correlated with baseline clinical parameters and long-term oncological outcome. Survival estimates were determined according to Kaplan-Meier.
Results: A total of 60 patients were included in this study. Estimates for three-year overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were 94.5% and 80%. Five patients developed local (n = 2) or locoregional and local (n = 3) failure. Baseline PET/CT related parameters correlated with primary tumor stage, nodal stage and tumor grading. DFS was independent of T-stage, N-stage and baseline 18F-FDG-uptake.
Conclusion: In this cohort of PET/CT staged AC patients, excellent outcomes for DFS were seen. PET-based markers of tumor burden correlate with local stage of AC, however, are not of prognostic relevance for disease-free survival.
Keywords: Anal cancer; PET; Radiochemotherapy; Radiotherapy.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
- 
    - Bilimoria K.Y. Outcomes and prognostic factors for squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal: analysis of patients from the National Cancer Data Base. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:624–631. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Johnson L.G., Madeleine M.M., Newcomer L.M., Schwartz S.M., Daling J.R. Anal cancer incidence and survival: The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results experience, 1973–2000. Cancer. 2004;101:281–288. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Ajani J.A. Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal. JAMA. 2008;299:1914. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Bartelink H. Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: Results of a phase III randomized trial of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer radiotherapy and gastro. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2040–2049. - PubMed
 
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
 
         
              