Effect of socioeconomic inequalities and contextual factors on induced abortion in Ghana: A Bayesian multilevel analysis
- PMID: 32645088
- PMCID: PMC7347215
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235917
Effect of socioeconomic inequalities and contextual factors on induced abortion in Ghana: A Bayesian multilevel analysis
Abstract
There is a dearth of information on induced abortion in Ghana, possibly owing to the sensitive nature of the subject. In this study, we examine the effect of socioeconomic and contextual factors on induced abortion in Ghana. This study draws on data from the 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Survey. The study used a Bayesian multilevel logistic regression analysis to estimate both individual- and contextual-level factors affecting induced abortion levels in Ghana. The results show a total induced abortion prevalence of 19.6% coupled with considerable district-level disparities. Induced abortion is significantly associated with socioeconomic factors such as educational attainment, wealth status, and marital status at the individual-level. The risk of induced abortion is considerably higher among the educated, wealthy, and cohabiting women. The current age of women, age at first sex, religious affiliation, parity, and type of residence are the demographic factors having an association with induced abortion levels. At the contextual-level, district health insurance coverage and poverty rate have a significant association with induced abortion. Induced abortion appears to be prevalent in Ghana and is underpinned by both individual-level socioeconomic and aggregate-level factors. Addressing induced abortion levels in Ghana may require policies that take a multilevel approach by focusing on the socioeconomic status of women and district-level contextual factors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist
Similar articles
-
Spatial variations and socioeconomic determinants of modern contraceptive use in Ghana: A Bayesian multilevel analysis.PLoS One. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0230139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230139. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32155217 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond counting induced abortions, miscarriages and stillbirths to understanding their risk factors: analysis of the 2017 Ghana maternal health survey.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 16;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03633-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 33593319 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of abortion among women of reproductive age in Ghana: multilevel analysis evidence from the 2022 Ghana demographic and health survey.BMC Womens Health. 2025 May 15;25(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03779-z. BMC Womens Health. 2025. PMID: 40369499 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Unsafe Induced Abortion among Women in Ghana.J Pregnancy. 2019 Feb 3;2019:9253650. doi: 10.1155/2019/9253650. eCollection 2019. J Pregnancy. 2019. PMID: 30854238 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic determinants of cumulative fertility in Ghana.PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):e0252519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252519. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34061887 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Abortion and its correlates among female fisherfolk along Lake Victoria in Uganda.J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Nov;10(11):3968-3975. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_771_21. Epub 2021 Nov 29. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021. PMID: 35136754 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Annas GJ, Elias S. Legal and ethical issues in obstetric practice In Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, editors. Obstetrics: Normal and problem pregnancies (5th edition). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2007, p.1291–1301.
-
- Geelhoed DW, Nayembil D, Asare K, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, van Roosmalen J. Contraception and induced abortion in rural Ghana. Trop Med Inter Health. 2002; 7: 708–716. - PubMed
-
- Singh S, Remez L, Sedgh G, Kwok L, Onda T. Abortion Worldwide 2017: Uneven Progress and Unequal Access. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2018.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical