Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 7;12(7):1820.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12071820.

Prospective Assessment of Systemic MicroRNAs as Markers of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Prospective Assessment of Systemic MicroRNAs as Markers of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Andrew McGuire et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is used in locally advanced breast cancer to reduce tumour burden prior to surgical resection. However, only a subset of NACT treated patients will respond to treatment or achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR). This multicenter, prospective study (CTRIAL-IE (ICORG) 10-11 study) evaluated circulating microRNA as novel non-invasive prognostic biomarkers of NACT response in breast cancer. Selected circulating microRNAs (Let-7a, miR-21, miR-145, miR-155, miR-195) were quantified from patients undergoing standard of care NACT treatment (n = 114) from whole blood at collected at diagnosis, and the association with NACT response and clinicopathological features evaluated. NACT responders had significantly lower levels of miR-21 (p = 0.036) and miR-195 (p = 0.017), compared to non-responders. Evaluating all breast cancer cases miR-21 was found to be an independent predictor of response (OR 0.538, 95% CI 0.308-0.943, p < 0.05). Luminal cancer NACT responders were found to have significantly decreased levels of miR-145 (p = 0.033) and miR-21 (p = 0.048), compared to non-responders. This study demonstrates the prognostic ability of miR-21, miR-195 and miR-145 as circulating biomarkers stratifying breast cancer patients by NACT response, identifying patients that will derive the maximum benefit from chemotherapy.

Keywords: biomarker; breast; chemotherapy; microRNA; neoadjuvant; prognostic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M. Kerin, H. Heneghan and N. Miller: circulating miR-195 as a biomarker patent. All miRNA were measured on blinded samples and the unblinded analysis was performed by independent study statisticians. All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Levels of indicated miRNAs in the specified breast cancer subtypes. No significant association between the target miRNA level and any breast cancer subtype was found. Luminal, n = 57; Luminal B Her2, n = 20; Her2+, n = 14; Triple negative, n = 23.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between the target miRNAs levels and tumour bed response to NACT in responders compared to non-responders. Responders n = 51, Non-responders n = 58. p < 0.05 considered significant.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Univariate analysis of miRNA-21 and miRNA-195 level as an independent predictor of response. (A) For miRNA-21 every unit increase miRNA-21, the odds ratio of being a non-responder relative to a responder is 1.86 (1/0.538) times higher. (B) miRNA-195—with every unit increase in miRNA-195, the odds ratio of being a non-responder relative to a responder is 1.78 (1/0.561) times higher. Observations = n (indicated for each).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Variation in levels of each target miRNA by response to NACT was assessed in the four breast cancer subtypes. (A) miRNA-21 patients with low levels had a higher response rate in Luminal cancers. (B) miRNA-145 patients with low levels had a higher response rate in Luminal cancers. Luminal (responders n = 15, non-responders n = 41), Luminal B Her2 (responders n = 12, non-responders n = 7), Her2+ (non-luminal) (responders n = 10, non-responders n = 3), Triple negative (responders n = 14, non-responders n = 9). p < 0.05 considered significant.

References

    1. Cortazar P., Zhang L., Untch M., Mehta K., Costantino J.P., Wolmark N., Bonnefoi H., Cameron D., Gianni L., Valagussa P., et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: The CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164–172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Battisti N.M.L., True V., Chaabouni N., Chopra N., Lee K., Shepherd S., Shapira-Rotenberg T., Joshi R., McGrath S., Okines A., et al. Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in 789 early and locally advanced breast cancer patients: The Royal Marsden experience. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019;179:101–111. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05444-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fayanju O.M., Ren Y., Thomas S.M., Greenup R.A., Plichta J.K., Rosenberger L.H., Tamirisa N., Force J., Boughey J.C., Hyslop T., et al. The Clinical Significance of Breast-only and Node-only Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT): A Review of 20,000 Breast Cancer Patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Ann. Surg. 2018;268:591–601. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002953. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perou C.M., Sørlie T., Eisen M.B., Van De Rijn M., Jeffrey S.S., A Rees C., Pollack J.R., Ross U.T., Johnsen H., Akslen L.A., et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–752. doi: 10.1038/35021093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldhirsch A., Wood W.C., Coates A.S., Gelber R.D., Thürlimann B., Senn H.-J., Members P. Strategies for subtypes—Dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: Highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann. Oncol. 2011;22:1736–1747. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr304. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources