Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 17;5(7):1000-1006.
doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.04.006. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Systematic Review of Atrial Vascular Access for Dialysis Catheter

Affiliations

Systematic Review of Atrial Vascular Access for Dialysis Catheter

Carole Philipponnet et al. Kidney Int Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: The last decade has seen a steady increase worldwide in the prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Hemodialysis is the major modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in 70% to 90% of patients, who require well-functioning vascular access for this procedure. The recommended access for hemodialysis is an arteriovenous fistula or a vascular graft. However, recourse to central venous catheters remains essential for patients whose chronic renal disease is diagnosed at the end stage or in whom an arteriovenous fistula cannot be created or maintained. Tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) exposure can induce venous stenosis and occlusions and can result in superior vena cava syndrome and/or vascular access loss. Exhaustion of conventional vascular accesses is 1 of the greatest challenges that nephrologists and patients have to face. Several unconventional salvage-therapy routes for TDC placement in patients with exhausted upper body venous access have been reported in the literature.

Methods: We report 2 new cases of intra-atrial TDC placement for patients with exhausted vascular access and perform a meta-analysis of cases from the literature.

Results: A total of 51 patients were included. The TDC was inserted by a cardiovascular surgeon in all cases. At the end of follow-up, 75% patients were alive. The median survival time was 25 months. Survival time of hemodialysis patients with intra-atrial TDC was lower than that observed with conventional TDC.

Conclusions: This unconventional technique is safe and functional for hemodialysis patients with exhausted venous access. Atrial vascular access for TDC placement is salvage therapy and is therefore potentially lifesaving.

Keywords: dialysis catheter; exhausted vascular accesses; hemodialysis; intra-atrial catheter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intra-atrial tunneled dialysis catheter in patient 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival time with intra-atrial tunneled dialysis catheter in 24 patients.

References

    1. Oguz E., Ozturk P., Erkul S., Calkavur T. Right intra-atrial catheter placement for hemodialysis in patients with multiple venous failure. Hemodial Int. 2012;16:306–309. - PubMed
    1. Murad M.H., Sultan S., Haffar S., Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23:60–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Der Simonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–188. - PubMed
    1. Fine J.P., Gray R.J. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:96–509.
    1. Chavanon O., Maurizi-Balzan J., Chavanis N. Successful prolonged use of an intracardiac catheter for dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:2015–2016. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources