Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Sep;127(9):1257-1270.
doi: 10.1007/s00702-020-02223-w. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

Is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective for chronic low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective for chronic low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mohammad Alwardat et al. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to reduce pain in range of chronic pain states. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of tDCS on pain reduction and related disability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP). A computer-based systematic literature search was performed in five databases according to PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of tDCS on pain and related disability in patients with non-specific CLBP were included. Modified Jadad scale and Cochrane's risk of bias assessment were used to determine the studies' quality and risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) at 95% confidence interval (CI). Nine RCTs (411 participants) were included in the systematic review according to inclusion criteria, while only five studies could be included in the meta-analysis. The primary motor cortex (M1) was the main stimulated target. The meta-analysis showed non-significant effect of multiple sessions of tDCS over M1 on pain reduction and disability post-treatment respectively, (SMD = 0.378; 95% CI = - 0.264-1.020; P = 0.249), (SMD = 0.143; 95% CI = - 0.214-0.499; P = 0.434). No significant adverse events were reported. The current results do not support the clinical use of tDCS for the reduction of pain and related disability in non-specific CLBP. However, the limited number of available evidence limits our conclusions on the effectiveness of these approaches.

Keywords: Chronic pain; Low back pain; Neuromodulation; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Systematic review; Transcranial direct current stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C et al (2006) Chapter 4: European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):S192–S300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Alwardat M, Schirinzi T, Di Lazzaro G et al (2019) Association between physical activity and dementia’s risk factors in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm 126:319–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-019-01979-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. An X, Bandler R, Öngür D, Price JL (1998) Prefrontal cortical projections to longitudinal columns in the midbrain periaqueductal gray in macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol 401:455–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19981130)401:4<455:AID-CNE3&g... - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M et al (2017) Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 128:1774–1809 - DOI
    1. Antal A, Brepohl N, Poreisz C et al (2008) Transcranial direct current stimulation over somatosensory cortex decreases experimentally Induced acute pain perception. Clin J Pain 24:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e318157233b - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources