Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;11(8):1849-1860.
doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00867-1. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

Effects of Ertugliflozin on Liver Enzymes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Post-Hoc Pooled Analysis of Phase 3 Trials

Affiliations

Effects of Ertugliflozin on Liver Enzymes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Post-Hoc Pooled Analysis of Phase 3 Trials

Silvina Gallo et al. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: This post hoc exploratory analysis examined the effects of ertugliflozin on liver enzymes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: Data were pooled from seven randomized, double-blind VERTIS phase 3 trials that evaluated ertugliflozin (5 mg and 15 mg) versus non-ertugliflozin (placebo, glimepiride, or sitagliptin) treatment in patients with T2DM. Change from baseline at week 52 of treatment in alanine and aspartate aminotransferase (ALT and AST, respectively) serum levels (overall and categorized into tertiles by baseline ALT and AST), Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and body weight were evaluated, along with the association between changes in ALT and AST and changes in HbA1c and body weight by treatment.

Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment groups (ertugliflozin 5 mg, n = 1716; ertugliflozin 15 mg, n = 1693; non-ertugliflozin, n = 1450). At week 52 of treatment, serum levels of ALT and AST were reduced in patients in the ertugliflozin treatment groups (5 and 15 mg, respectively) compared with those in the non-ertugliflozin group. The comparator-adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) difference in change from baseline at week 52 for ALT was - 3.35 (- 4.40, - 2.31) IU/L for ertugliflozin 5 mg and - 4.08 (- 5.13, - 3.03) IU/L for ertugliflozin 15 mg; for AST, the respective values were - 1.81 (- 2.50, - 1.11) IU/L and - 2.12 (- 2.82, - 1.42) IU/L. The effects of ertugliflozin were detected across all baseline ALT and AST tertiles, with the highest tertile showing the greatest treatment differences. No meaningful differences were observed between treatment groups for FIB-4. Changes in ALT and AST showed a weak but statistically significant association with changes in HbA1c and body weight in all treatment groups.

Conclusions: Treatment with ertugliflozin resulted in a reduction in the levels of hepatic transaminases compared with the non-ertugliflozin group after 52 weeks of treatment. Changes in body weight and HbA1c contributed at least in part to the effects of ertugliflozin on liver enzymes.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registry numbers: NCT02033889, NCT01958671, NCT02036515, NCT01986855, NCT02099110, NCT02226003, NCT01999218.

Keywords: Alanine aminotransferase; Aspartate aminotransferase; Body weight; Ertugliflozin; Fibrosis-4 index; HbA1c; Liver enzymes; SGLT2 inhibitor; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Least squares (LS) mean absolute and percentage change from baseline at week 52 in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (a) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (b). aDifference in LS means with the 95% confidence interval (CI) in parenthesis. SD Standard deviation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Least squares (LS) mean absolute change from baseline at week 52 in ALT (a) and AST (b) by tertiles of baseline ALT and AST. aDifference in LS means with the 95% CI in parenthesis. ALT Alanine aminotransferase,AST aspartate aminotransferase,CI confidence interval,SD standard deviation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline at week 52 in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight. aDifference in LS means (95% CI). CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation

References

    1. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L, Paik JM, Srishord M, Fukui N, et al. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2019;71:793–801. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tomic D, Kemp WW, Roberts SK. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: current concepts, epidemiology and management strategies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30:1103–1115. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001235. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spengler EK, Loomba R. Recommendations for diagnosis, referral for liver biopsy, and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:1233–1246. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.06.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anstee QM, Targher G, Day CP. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:330–344. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.41. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cotter TG, Rinella M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease 2020: The state of the disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1851–1864. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.052. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources