Subclinical left atrial dysfunction profiles for prediction of cardiac outcome in the general population
- PMID: 32649644
- DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002572
Subclinical left atrial dysfunction profiles for prediction of cardiac outcome in the general population
Abstract
Objective: Echocardiographic definitions of subclinical left atrial dysfunction based on epidemiological data remain scarce. In this population study, we derived outcome-driven thresholds for echocardiographic left atrial function parameters discriminating between normal and abnormal values.
Methods: In 1306 individuals (mean age, 50.7 years; 51.6% women), we echocardiographically assessed left atrial function and LV global longitudinal strain. We derived cut-off values for left atrial emptying fraction (LAEF), left atrial function index (LAFI) and left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) to define left atrial dysfunction using receiver-operating curve threshold analysis. Main outcome was the incidence of cardiac events and atrial fibrillation (AFib) on average 8.5 years later.
Results: For prediction of new-onset AFib, left atrial cut-offs yielding the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (highest Youden index) were: LAEF less than 55%, LAFI less than 40.5 and LARS less than 23%. Applying these cut-offs, abnormal LAEF, LAFI and LARS were, respectively, present in 27, 37.1 and 18.1% of the cohort. Abnormal LARS (<23%) was independently associated with higher risk for cardiac events and new-onset AFib (P ≤ 0.012). Participants with both abnormal LAEF and LARS presented a significantly higher risk to develop cardiac events (hazard ratio: 2.10; P = 0.014) and AFib (hazard ratio: 6.45; P = 0.0036) than normal counterparts. The concomitant presence of an impaired LARS and LV global longitudinal strain improved prognostic accuracy beyond a clinical risk model for cardiac events and the CHARGE-AF Risk Score for AFib.
Conclusion: Left atrial dysfunction based on outcome-driven thresholds predicted cardiac events and AFib independent of conventional risk factors. Screening for subclinical left atrial and LV systolic dysfunction may enhance cardiac disease prediction in the community.
References
-
- Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, Grobbee R, Maniadakis N, Flather M, et al. ESC Scientific Document GroupEuropean Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. Eur Heart J 2018; 39:508–579.
-
- Lieb W, Gona P, Larson MG, Aragam J, Zile MR, Cheng S, et al. The natural history of left ventricular geometry in the community: clinical correlates and prognostic significance of change in LV geometric pattern. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7:870–878.
-
- Cauwenberghs N, Knez J, D’hooge J, Thijs L, Yang W-Y, Wei F-F, et al. Longitudinal changes in LV structure and diastolic function in relation to arterial properties in general population. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10:1307–1316.
-
- Kuznetsova T, Nijs E, Cauwenberghs N, Knez J, Thijs L, Haddad F, et al. Temporal changes in left ventricular longitudinal strain in general population: clinical correlates and impact on cardiac remodeling. Echocardiography 2019; 36:458–468.
-
- Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18:891–975.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
