Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug:129:104538.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2

Affiliations

Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2

Hannah M Creager et al. J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) in the detection of SARS CoV-2 in comparison against three other SARS CoV-2 EUA assays. In these studies, the RP2.1 panel had 98 % positive percent agreement (48/49) and 100 % negative percent agreement (49/49). Since 30 % of nasopharyngeal swab specimens have a SARS CoV-2 Ct >30 and thus detection of virus in low titers is clinically relevant, a sample with a high titer was diluted and each 10 fold dilution was tested in triplicate and compared against 6 other EUA approved SARS CoV-2 assays. These data suggested that the BioFire® RP2.1 panel, along with four other SARS CoV-2 assays (Roche cobas, Cepheid Xpert Xpress, BioFire® Defense COVID19, and NECoV19), consistently detected viral RNA at the 10-7 dilution. Overall, these studies suggest that the BioFire® RP2.1 assay can be used to detect acute cases of SARS CoV2 in addition to patients with low viral titer later in disease presentation.

Keywords: COVID19; Diagnostics; SARS CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The Corresponding author has acted as a consultant and received grant funding from BioFire Diagnostics.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ct distribution of specimens tested in clinical study. Ct values are shown for each assay used for characterizing clinical specimens, as indicated on the X axis. Horizontal bars represent Ct median values for each assay.

References

    1. Moran A., Beavis K.G., Matushek S.M., Ciaglia C., Francois N., Tesic V., Love N. The detection of SARS-CoV-2 using the cepheid xpert xpress SARS-CoV-2 and Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020 doi: 10.1128/JCM.00772-20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pujadas E., Ibeh N., Hernandez M.M., Waluszko A., Sidorenko T., Flores V., Shiffrin B., Chiu N., Young-Francois A., Nowak M.D., Paniz-Mondolfi A.E., Sordillo E.M., Cordon-Cardo C., Houldsworth J., Gitman M.R. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal swab samples by the Roche cobas(R) 6800 SARS-CoV-2 test and a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR test. J. Med. Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25988. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cordes A.K., Heim A. Rapid random access detection of the novel SARS-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2, previously 2019-nCoV) using an open access protocol for the Panther Fusion. J. Clin. Virol. 2020;125 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hogan C.A., Sahoo M.K., Huang C., Garamani N., Stevens B., Zehnder J., Pinsky B.A. Comparison of the Panther Fusion and a laboratory-developed test targeting the envelope gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2. J. Clin. Virol. 2020;127 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lieberman J.A., Pepper G., Naccache S.N., Huang M.L., Jerome K.R., Greninger A.L. Comparison of commercially available and laboratory developed assays for in vitro detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical laboratories. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020 doi: 10.1128/JCM.00821-20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types