Forensic mental health in Europe: some key figures
- PMID: 32651594
- PMCID: PMC7847441
- DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-01909-6
Forensic mental health in Europe: some key figures
Abstract
Purpose: While the number of forensic beds and the duration of psychiatric forensic psychiatric treatment have increased in several European Union (EU) states, this is not observed in others. Patient demographics, average lengths of stay and legal frameworks also differ substantially. The lack of basic epidemiological information on forensic patients and of shared indicators on forensic care within Europe is an obstacle to comparative research. The reasons for such variation are not well understood.
Methods: Experts from seventeen EU states submitted data on forensic bed prevalence rates, gender distributions and average length of stay in forensic in-patient facilities. Average length of stay and bed prevalence rates were examined for associations with country-level variables including Gross Domestic Product (GDP), expenditure on healthcare, prison population, general psychiatric bed prevalence rates and democracy index scores.
Results: The data demonstrated substantial differences between states. Average length of stay was approximately ten times greater in the Netherlands than Slovenia. In England and Wales, 18% of patients were female compared to 5% in Slovenia. There was a 17-fold difference in forensic bed rates per 100,000 between the Netherlands and Spain. Exploratory analyses suggested average length of stay was associated with GDP, expenditure on healthcare and democracy index scores.
Conclusion: The data presented in this study represent the most recent overview of key epidemiological data in forensic services across seventeen EU states. However, systematically collected epidemiological data of good quality remain elusive in forensic psychiatry. States need to develop common definitions and recording practices and contribute to a publicly available database of such epidemiological indicators.
Keywords: Beds; Deinstitutionalization; Europe; Forensic mental health; Prevalence.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Highly varying concepts and capacities of forensic mental health services across the European Union.Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;11:1095743. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1095743. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36778562 Free PMC article.
-
Admission of mentally disordered offenders to specialized forensic care in fifteen European Union member states.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;42(4):336-42. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0159-2. Epub 2007 Feb 13. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17370050
-
The relationship between deinstitutionalization and quality of care in longer-term psychiatric and social care facilities in Europe: A cross-sectional study.Eur Psychiatry. 2017 May;42:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Dec 22. Eur Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28364688
-
From the hospital into the community and back again - a trend towards re-institutionalisation in mental health care?Int Rev Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;20(6):527-34. doi: 10.1080/09540260802565372. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2008. PMID: 19085409 Review.
-
[Penrose's law: reality or fiction? Mental health system and the size of prison population - international overview].Orv Hetil. 2009 Jul 12;150(28):1321-30. doi: 10.1556/OH.2009.28633. Orv Hetil. 2009. PMID: 19581161 Review. Hungarian.
Cited by
-
Availability of opioid agonist treatment and critical incidents in Forensic Clinics for Dependency Diseases in Germany.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 7;13:961549. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.961549. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 36159944 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Affecting Treatment Regress and Progress in Forensic Psychiatry: A Thematic Analysis.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 12;13:884410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.884410. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35903640 Free PMC article.
-
Psychiatric Hospitalizations of People Found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder in France: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study (2011-2020).Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 5;13:812790. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.812790. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35449565 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment Decision-Making Capacity in Forensic vs Non-forensic Psychiatric Patients: A European Comparison.Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 Jun 16;3(1):sgac037. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac037. eCollection 2022 Jan. Schizophr Bull Open. 2022. PMID: 39144784 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Legal Traditions on Forensic Mental Health Treatment Worldwide.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:876619. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.876619. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35546946 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Salize HJ, Dreßing H (2005) Placement and treatment of mentally ill offenders – legislation and practice in EU Member States. Pabst Scientific Publishers, Lengerich Berlin Bremen Miami Riga Viernheim Wien Zagreb
-
- Sampson S, Edworthy R, Völlm B, Bulten E. Long-term forensic mental health services: an exploratory comparison of 18 European countries. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2016 doi: 10.1080/14999013.2016.1221484. - DOI
-
- Gunn J, Mevis P (2018) Adversarial versus inquisitorial systems of trial and investigation in criminal procedure. In: Forensic psychiatry psychol. Eur. Springer, Cham, pp 3–17. 10.1007/978-3-319-74664-7_1
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical