Strategies to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction
- PMID: 32651652
- PMCID: PMC7686179
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01926-8
Strategies to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction
Abstract
Background: Surgery remains the cornerstone of esophageal cancer treatment but is burdened with high procedure-related morbidity. Anastomotic leakage as the most important surgical complication after esophagectomy is a key indicator for quality in surgical outcome research.
Purpose: The aim of this narrative review is to assess and summarize the current knowledge on prevention of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and to provide orientation for the reader in this challenging field of surgery.
Conclusions: There are various strategies to reduce postoperative morbidity and to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy, including adequate patient selection and preparation, and many technical-surgical and anesthesiological details. The scientific evidence regarding those strategies is highly heterogeneous, ranging from expert's recommendations to randomized controlled trials. This review is intended to serve as an empirical guideline to improve the clinical management of patients undergoing esophagectomy with a special focus on anastomotic leakage prevention.
Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; Esophagectomy; Prevention.
Conflict of interest statement
Christian A. Gutschow and Diana Vetter have received an investor-initiated research grant from B. Braun Surgical, S.A., Barcelona, Spain.
References
-
- Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling G, Davies A, D’Journo XB, Gisbertz SS, Griffin SM, Hardwick R, Hoelscher A, Hofstetter W, Jobe B, Kitagawa Y, Law S, Mariette C, Maynard N, Morse CR, Nafteux P, Pera M, Pramesh CS, Puig S, Reynolds JV, Schroeder W, Smithers M, Wijnhoven BPL. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):291–298. - PubMed
-
- Schmidt HM, Gisbertz SS, Moons J, Rouvelas I, Kauppi J, Brown A, Asti E, Luyer M, Lagarde SM, Berlth F, Philippron A, Bruns C, Hölscher A, Schneider PM, Raptis DA, Henegouwen MIB, Nafteux P, Nilsson M, Räsanen J, Palazzo F, Rosato E, Mercer S, Bonavina L, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Wijnhoven BPL, Schröder W, Pattyn P, Grimminger PP, Gutschow CA. Defining benchmarks for transthoracic esophagectomy: a multicenter analysis of Total minimally invasive esophagectomy in low risk patients. Ann Surg. 2017;266(5):814–821. - PubMed
-
- Fransen LFC, Berkelmans GHK, Asti E, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Berlth F, Bonavina L, Brown A, Bruns C, van Daele E, Gisbertz SS, Grimminger PP, Gutschow CA, Hannink G, Hölscher AH, Kauppi J, Lagarde SM, Mercer S, Moons J, Nafteux P, Nilsson M, Palazzo F, Pattyn P, Raptis DA, Räsanen J, Rosato EL, Rouvelas I, Schmidt HM, Schneider PM, Schröder W, van der Sluis PC, Wijnhoven BPL, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MDP (2020) The effect of postoperative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy on long-term survival: an international multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg - PubMed
-
- Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, Mabrut JY, Bail JP, Carrere N, Lefevre JH, Brigand C, Vaillant JC, Adham M, Msika S, Demartines N, Nakadi IE, Meunier B, Collet D, Mariette C, FREGAT (French Eso-Gastric Tumors) working group, FRENCH (Fédération de Recherche EN CHirurgie), and AFC (Association Française de Chirurgie) The impact of severe anastomotic leak on long-term survival and cancer recurrence after surgical resection for esophageal malignancy. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):972–980. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
