Patient preferences for osteoarthritis pain and chronic low back pain treatments in the United States: a discrete-choice experiment
- PMID: 32652238
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.06.006
Patient preferences for osteoarthritis pain and chronic low back pain treatments in the United States: a discrete-choice experiment
Abstract
Objective: To quantify preferences for attributes of potential analgesic treatments for moderate-to-severe pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) and/or chronic low back pain (CLBP) as relevant to injectable nerve growth factor (NGF)-inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids.
Methods: We used a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) to elicit preferences for attributes of OA and CLBP pharmaceutical treatments, and a best-worst scaling (BWS) exercise to further characterize the relative importance of treatment-related side-effect risks. The survey was completed online by 602 US residents with self-reported chronic, moderate-to-severe OA pain and/or CLBP who had tried, had contraindications for, or were unwilling to take currently available pharmaceutical therapies. In the DCE, respondents repeatedly chose between two hypothetical treatments defined by six attributes (symptom control; treatment-related risks of (1) severe joint problems, (2) heart attack, and (3) physical dependence; mode/frequency of administration; and cost). In the BWS exercise, respondents evaluated ten side-effect risks. Random-parameters logit models were estimated; conditional relative attribute importance, maximum acceptable risks, and willingness to pay were calculated.
Results: The most important DCE attributes were improving symptom control (scaled conditional relative importance, 10.00) and reducing risk of physical dependence (6.99). The three most important BWS attributes were, in rank order, risks of stroke, physical dependence, and heart attack. Respondents were willing to accept a > 4% treatment-related risk of severe joint problems for even modest symptom improvement.
Conclusion: A pharmaceutical treatment with a risk of severe joint problems was viewed as an acceptable alternative to other treatments with comparable efficacy but risks associated with NSAIDs or opioids.
Keywords: Benefit-risk; Best-worst scaling; Non-opioid; Pain; Stated preference.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
A plain-language summary to complement a publication reporting patient preferences for analgesic therapy characteristics by Turk et al.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021 Aug;29(8):1237-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 13. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021. PMID: 33992760 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Exploring patient preference heterogeneity for pharmacological treatments for chronic pain: A latent class analysis.Eur J Pain. 2022 Mar;26(3):648-667. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1892. Epub 2022 Jan 8. Eur J Pain. 2022. PMID: 34854164 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Fulranumab as an Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Inadequately Controlled, Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Dose-loading Phase II Study.Clin Ther. 2016 Jun;38(6):1435-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.030. Epub 2016 Apr 18. Clin Ther. 2016. PMID: 27101815 Clinical Trial.
-
A discrete-choice experiment of United Kingdom patients' willingness to risk adverse events for improved function and pain control in osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Feb;21(2):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.007. Epub 2012 Nov 24. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013. PMID: 23182815
-
Evidence-Based Recommendations on the Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis and Chronic Low Back Pain: An Asian Consensus.Asian J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun 1;57(2):37-54. doi: 10.6859/aja.201906_57(2).0003. Asian J Anesthesiol. 2019. PMID: 31382324 Review.
-
Opioid therapy for osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain.Postgrad Med. 2010 Nov;122(6):87-97. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.11.2226. Postgrad Med. 2010. PMID: 21084785 Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding general practitioners' prescribing choices to patients with chronic low back pain: a discrete choice experiment.Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Feb;46(1):111-121. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01649-y. Epub 2023 Oct 26. Int J Clin Pharm. 2024. PMID: 37882955 Free PMC article.
-
Possible synergic action of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and glucosamine sulfate for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a scoping review.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 12;23(1):1084. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06046-6. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022. PMID: 36510167 Free PMC article.
-
Research Priorities to Increase Confidence in and Acceptance of Health Preference Research: What Questions Should be Prioritized Now?Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):179-190. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00650-x. Epub 2023 Dec 16. Patient. 2024. PMID: 38103109 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Preferences for Post-Radical Cystectomy Treatment in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Japan.Int J Urol. 2025 Jun;32(6):688-697. doi: 10.1111/iju.70032. Epub 2025 Mar 10. Int J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40062520 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamics of Patient-Based Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Sep 20;16:2609-2637. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S375062. eCollection 2022. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022. PMID: 36164323 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical