Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;28(2):351-357.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

Postoperative Urinary Retention after Benign Gynecologic Surgery with a Liberal versus Strict Voiding Protocol

Matthew T Siedhoff  1 , Kelly N Wright  2 , Meenal A Misal  2 , Andrea L Molina  2 , Naomi H Greene  2
Affiliations

Postoperative Urinary Retention after Benign Gynecologic Surgery with a Liberal versus Strict Voiding Protocol

Matthew T Siedhoff et al. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Study objective: Surgeons employ various methods for evaluating what is considered a common occurrence after gynecologic operations, postoperative urinary retention (POUR). Few have reported the incidence of POUR with a liberal voiding protocol (no requirement to void before discharge). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of POUR after benign gynecologic surgery, comparing a liberal voiding protocol with more strict voiding protocols. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS) and urinary tract infection (UTI).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Quaternary-care academic hospital in the United States.

Patients: Patients undergoing hysterectomy or myomectomy at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center from August 2017 through July 2018 (n = 652). Cases involving incontinence operations, correction of pelvic organ prolapse, malignancy, or peripartum hysterectomy were excluded.

Interventions: Hysterectomy, myomectomy.

Measurements and main results: POUR, defined as the need for recatheterization within 24 hours of catheter removal, along with UTI and LOS were compared between liberal and strict voiding protocols. A subgroup analysis was performed for those undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS). A total of 303 (46.5%) women underwent surgery with a liberal postoperative voiding protocol and 349 (53.5%) women with a strict voiding protocol. Overall, the incidence of POUR was low at 3.8% and not different between the groups (2.6% liberal vs. 4.9% strict, p = .14). UTIs also occurred infrequently (2.8% overall, 2.6% liberal vs. 2.9% strict, p = .86). Similar results were seen specifically among those who underwent MIS: POUR (3.7% overall, 2.8% liberal vs. 5.3% strict, p = .17) and UTI (3.3% overall, 2.4% liberal vs. 4.7% strict, p = .28). The median LOS (interquartile range) was much shorter for MIS patients with a liberal voiding protocol (median 15 hours overall [interquartile range 15 hours], 9 [4] hours liberal vs. 36 [34] hours strict, p <.01). Among those discharged the same day (72.6% of the MIS cases), patients with a liberal voiding protocol had a significantly shorter LOS than those with strict (mean [standard deviation] 9.4 [2.5] hours vs. 10.6 [35] hours, p <.01). Postoperative complications occurred less frequently in those with MIS procedures (11.8% in MIS vs. 20.2% in laparotomies, p <.01) and those with liberal voiding protocols (11.2% liberal vs. 16.9% strict p = .04).

Conclusion: Overall, POUR occurs infrequently after major benign gynecologic surgery and does not differ between those with liberal and strict voiding protocols. Our data suggest that same-day discharge after MIS hysterectomy and myomectomy without a requirement to void does not increase the risk of POUR and shortens LOS. Eliminating voiding protocols after these procedures may facilitate greater efficiency in the postanesthesia recovery unit and may contribute to enhanced recovery after surgery protocols.

Keywords: Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Myomectomy; Same-day discharge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement: Dr. Siedhoff has served as a consultant for Applied Medical, Eximis Surgical, Hologic, Caldera Medical, Cooper Surgical, and Olympus. Dr. Wright has served as a consultant for Applied Medical, Caldera Medical, Hologic, and Karl Storz. The authors report no relevant conflict of interest.

References

    1. Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology. 2009. May;110(5):1139–57. - PubMed
    1. Kandadai P, Saini J, Patterson D, O’Dell K, Flynn M. Urinary Retention After Hysterectomy and Postoperative Analgesic Use. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015. Sep-Oct;21(5):257–62. - PubMed
    1. Espaillat-Rijo L, Siff L, Alas AN, Chadi SA, Zimberg S, Vaish S, et al. Intraoperative Cystoscopic Evaluation of Ureteral Patency: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. December;128(6):1378–83. - PubMed
    1. Parrish AB, O’Neill SM, Crain SR, Russell TA, Sonthalia DK, Nguyen VT, et al. An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Ambulatory Anorectal Surgery Reduced Postoperative Pain and Unplanned Returns to Care After Discharge. World J Surg. 2018. July;42(7):1929–38. - PubMed
    1. Zaheer S, Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup D. Urinary retention after operations for benign anorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998. June;41(6):696–704. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms