The 2018 Banff Working Group classification of definitive polyomavirus nephropathy: A multicenter validation study in the modern era
- PMID: 32654412
- PMCID: PMC7891590
- DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16189
The 2018 Banff Working Group classification of definitive polyomavirus nephropathy: A multicenter validation study in the modern era
Abstract
Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) remained inadequately classified until 2018 when the Banff Working Group published a new 3-tier morphologic classification scheme derived from in-depth statistical analysis of a large multinational patient cohort. Here we report a multicenter "modern-era" validation study that included 99 patients with definitive PVN transplanted post January 1, 2009 and followed the original 2018 study design. Results validate the PVN classification, that is, the 3 PVN disease classes predicted clinical presentation, allograft function, and outcome independent of therapeutic intervention. PVN class 1 compared to classes 2 and 3 was diagnosed earlier (16.9 weeks posttransplant [median], P = .004), and showed significantly better function at 24 months postindex biopsy (serum creatinine 1.75 mg/dl, geometric mean, vs class 2: P = .037, vs class 3: P = .013). Class 1 presented during long-term follow-up with a low graft failure rate: 5% class 1, vs 30% class 2, vs 50% class 3 (P = .009). Persistent PVN was associated with an increased risk for graft failure (and functional decline in class 2 at 24 months postdiagnosis; serum creatinine with persistence: 2.48 mg/dL vs 1.65 with clearance, geometric means, P = .018). In conclusion, we validate the 2018 Banff Working Group PVN classification that provides significant clinical information and enhances comparative data analysis.
Keywords: classification systems: Banff classification; clinical research/practice; complication: infectious; infection and infectious agents - viral: BK/JC/polyoma; infectious disease; kidney disease; kidney transplantation/nephrology; pathology/histopathology; translational research/science.
© 2020 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the
Figures
References
-
- Nickeleit V, Mihatsch MJ. Polyomavirus nephropathy in native kidneys and renal allografts: an update on an escalating threat. Transpl Int. 2006;19(12):960‐973. - PubMed
-
- Nankivell BJ, Renthawa J, Sharma RN, Kable K, O'Connell PJ, Chapman JR. BK virus nephropathy: histological evolution by sequential pathology. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(8):2065‐2077. - PubMed
-
- Drachenberg CB, Papadimitriou JC, Chaudhry MR, et al. Histological evolution of BK virus‐associated nephropathy: importance of integrating clinical and pathological findings. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(8):2078‐2091. - PubMed
-
- Gabardi S, Townsend K, Martin ST, Chandraker A. Evaluating the impact of pre‐transplant desensitization utilizing a plasmapheresis and low‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin protocol on BK viremia in renal transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15(4):361‐368. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
