Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Jun 1;10(6):338-342.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.106.

Sense-Making, Mutual Learning and Cognitive Shifts When Applying Systems Thinking in Public Health - Examples From Sweden Comment on "What Can Policy-Makers Get Out of Systems Thinking? Policy Partners' Experiences of a Systems-Focused Research Collaboration in Preventive Health"

Monica E Nyström  1   2 , Sara Tolf  1 , Helena Strehlenert  1   3
Affiliations
Comment

Sense-Making, Mutual Learning and Cognitive Shifts When Applying Systems Thinking in Public Health - Examples From Sweden Comment on "What Can Policy-Makers Get Out of Systems Thinking? Policy Partners' Experiences of a Systems-Focused Research Collaboration in Preventive Health"

Monica E Nyström et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that systems thinking (ST) should be implemented in the area of public health, but how this should be done is less clear. In this commentary we focus on sense-making and double-loop learning processes when using ST and soft systems methodology in research collaborations with policy-makers. In their study of policymakers' experiences of ST, Haynes et al emphasize the importance of knowledge processes and mutual learning between researchers and policy-makers, processes which can change how policy-makers think and thus have impact on real-world policy concerns. We provide some additional examples from Sweden on how ST has been applied to create learning and shared mental models among stakeholders and researchers in national and regional healthcare development initiatives. We conclude that investigating and describing such processes on micro-level can aid the knowledge on how to implement ST in public health.

Keywords: Double-Loop Learning; Healthcare Development; PolicyMakers; Soft Systems Methodology; Sweden; Systems Thinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment on

References

    1. Swanson RC, Cattaneo A, Bradley E. et al. Rethinking health systems strengthening: key systems thinking tools and strategies for transformational change. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(suppl 4):iv54–iv61. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs090. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russell E, Swanson RC, Atun R, Nishtar S, Chunharas S. Systems thinking for the post-2015 agenda. Lancet. 2014;383(9935):2124–2125. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61028-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cabrera D, Colosi L, Lobdell C. Systems thinking. Eval Program Plann. 2008;31(3):299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.12.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Savigny D, Adam, T. Systems thinking for health system strengthening. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization; 2009.
    1. Best A, Clark PI, Leischow SJ, Trochim WM. Greater than the sum: systems thinking in tobacco control. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health; 2007.

LinkOut - more resources