Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Versus Sunitinib for Patients with Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Sarcomatoid Features: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the IMmotion151 Clinical Trial
- PMID: 32654802
- PMCID: PMC9376009
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.021
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Versus Sunitinib for Patients with Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Sarcomatoid Features: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the IMmotion151 Clinical Trial
Abstract
Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features (sRCC) have a poor prognosis and have shown limited responsiveness to inhibition of the VEGF pathway. We conducted a prespecified analysis of the randomised, phase 3 IMmotion151 trial in previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic RCC to assess the effectiveness of atezolizumab + bevacizumab versus sunitinib in a subgroup of patients with sarcomatoid features. Patients whose tumour had any component of sarcomatoid features were included and received atezolizumab + bevacizumab (n = 68) or sunitinib (n = 74). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the group receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab overall (8.3 vs 5.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR] 0.52 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.79) and in the subset of patients with PD-L1-positive tumours (8.6 vs 5.6 mo; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.77). More patients receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab achieved an objective response (49% vs 14%), including complete responses (10% vs 3%), and reported greater symptom improvements versus sunitinib. Safety was consistent with the known profiles of each drug and with that reported in the overall safety-evaluable population of IMmotion151. This analysis supports enhanced activity of atezolizumab + bevacizumab in patients with sRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at patients with a specific type of kidney cancer (tumours with sarcomatoid features) that has been hard to treat. A treatment with two drugs (atezolizumab and bevacizumab) appeared to help patients live longer without the disease getting worse than another drug (sunitinib) that is often used. Patients who took the two drugs also said they were better able to carry out their everyday activities than patients who took sunitinib. The combination of these two drugs may work better in patients with this type of advanced kidney cancer.
Keywords: IMmotion151; RCC; atezolizumab; bevacizumab; metastatic renal cell carcinoma; sRCC; sarcomatoid.
Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Renal cell carcinoma with non-clear cell histology or sarcomatoid differentiation: recent insight in an unmet clinical need.Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):97. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7009. Ann Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 33569399 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Immune Checkpoint-responsive Subset?Eur Urol. 2021 May;79(5):663-664. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.042. Epub 2021 Feb 13. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 33593655 No abstract available.
References
-
- Delahunt B Sarcomatoid renal carcinoma: the final common dedifferentiation pathway of renal epithelial malignancies. Pathology 1999;31:185–90. - PubMed
-
- Störkel S, Eble JN, Adlakha K, et al. Classification of renal cell carcinoma: workgroup No. 1. Cancer 1997;80:987–9. - PubMed
-
- Shuch B, Amin A, Armstrong AJ, et al. Understanding pathologic variants of renal cell carcinoma: distilling therapeutic opportunities from biologic complexity. Eur Urol 2015;67:85–97. - PubMed
-
- Escudier B, Droz JP, Rolland F, et al. Doxorubicin and ifosamide in patients with metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: a phase II study of the Genitourinary Group of the French Federation of Cancer Centers. J Urol 2002;168:959–61. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials