Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 22:14:107.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00107. eCollection 2020.

Sex Differences in Cue Competition Effects With a Conditioned Taste Aversion Preparation

Affiliations

Sex Differences in Cue Competition Effects With a Conditioned Taste Aversion Preparation

Rocio Angulo et al. Front Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

This study aimed to test whether male and female rats might show differences in cue competition effects in a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) model. Experiment 1 tested for sex differences in overshadowing. After conditioning of a flavored compound AB or only one simple flavor A (being A and B a solution of sugar 10% and salt 1%, counterbalanced), consumption of the A solution at test was larger in the former than in the latter case only in males. Thus, the usual effect of overshadowing was observed in males but not in females. Experiment 2 examined sex differences in blocking with the same stimuli used in Experiment 1. After conditioning of AB, the consumption of B was larger for the animals that previously received a single conditioning trial with A than for those that received unpaired presentations of A and the illness. As observed in Experiment 1, the typical blocking effect appeared only in males but not in females. The present findings thus support the hypothesis that sex dimorphism might be expressed in classical conditioning, or at least, in cue competition effects such as overshadowing and blocking with a taste aversion model.

Keywords: blocking; classical conditioning; overshadowing; sex differences; taste aversion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consumption of the A solution in milliliters (ml) ± SEM for the groups Male-Over, Male-Ctrl, Female-Over and Female-Ctrl at test, in Experiment 1. *Indicates statistical significance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consumption of the B solution in milliliters (ml) ± SEM for the groups Male-Blk, Male-Ctrl, Female-BLK and Female-Ctrl at test, in Experiment 2. *Indicates statistical significance.

References

    1. Ahmed O., Lovibond P. F. (2015). The impact of instructions on generalization of conditioned fear in humans. Behav. Ther. 46, 597–603. 10.1016/j.beth.2014.12.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreano J. M., Dickerson B. C., Barrett L. F. (2013). Sex differences in the persistence of the amygdala response to negative material. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 1388–1394. 10.1093/scan/nst127 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreatta M., Leombruni E., Glotzbach-Schoon E., Pauli P., Mühlberger A. (2015). Generalization of contextual fear in humans. Behav. Ther. 46, 583–596. 10.1016/j.beth.2014.12.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angulo R., Arévalo-Romero C. (in press). Sexual dimorphism in classical conditioning? Sex differences in neophobia, latent inhibition, generalization and extinction in a conditioned taste aversion preparation irrespective of housing conditions (manuscript submitted for publication). - PubMed
    1. Beatty W. W., Beatty P. A. (1970). Hormonal determinants of sex differences in avoidance behavior and reactivity to electric shock in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol Psychol. 73, 446–455. 10.1037/h0030216 - DOI - PubMed