Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 31;16(3):167-170.
doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5041. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Dosimetric Comparison of Superflab and Specially Prepared Bolus Materials Used in Radiotherapy Practice

Serhat Aras  1 , İhsan Oğuz Tanzer  2 , Türkan İkizceli  3
Affiliations

Dosimetric Comparison of Superflab and Specially Prepared Bolus Materials Used in Radiotherapy Practice

Serhat Aras et al. Eur J Breast Health. .

Abstract

Objective: This study compares standard commercial bolus material (Superflab) to custom prepared silicone dental impression material (CDIM) and play dough material (PDM) with respect to dosimetric properties and applicability by using ion chamber measurement and calculated dose values.

Materials and methods: The CDIM bolus was prepared by mixing dental impression silicone material with enough water to maintain a density of about 1.0 g/cm3. The prepared bolus material is applied on an RW3 solid phantom by covering 10x10 cm2 area with 0.5-1 cm thickness. Ion chamber measurements were performed separately with and without bolus material application. The setup was scanned in CT and the same procedure was repeated in the TPS using the scan data, in which the Pencil Beam Convolution dose calculation algorithm was used. To compare the effect of bolus material on tissue, the Superflab bolus and CDIM bolus were applied with 1 cm of thickness on postmastectomy scar and dose calculations on TPS were performed.

Results: After comparison of the dosimetric values for Superflab, CDIM and PDM, we obtained statistically meaningful results between superflab and CDIM. For PDM, the results obtained with TPS and ion chamber measurements indicated that, it is not suitable to use in radiotherapy application due to its material properties. For the simulated skin dose values obtained at five random points on the scar tissue, the comparison of Superflab and CDIM TPS calculation results were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The CDIM is easy to prepare and apply on irregular mastectomy scar tissue and it prevents formation of air gaps in the application surface. Especially for curved anatomical regions such as scar tissue, inclusion of the bolus material in treatment planning protocol will reduce dose uncertainty in application. It is safe to use CDIM as an alternative to Superflab in radiotherapy application, whereas PDM is not useful in clinical practice due to its material properties.

Keywords: Bolus material; dental impression material; play dough; radiotherapy; superflab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Report. 1976;24:13. - PubMed
    1. Babic S, Kerr A, Westerlan M, Gooding J, Schreiner J. Examination of Jeltrate Plus as a tissue equivalent bolus material. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2002;3:170–175. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v3i3.2560. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vyas V, Palmer L, Mudge R, Jiang R, Fleck A, Schaly B, Osei E, et al. On bolus for megavoltage photon and electron radiation therapy. Med Dosim. 2013;38:268–273. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.02.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banaee N, Nedaie HA, Nosrati H, Nabavi M, Naderi M. Dose measurement of different bolus materials on surface dose. Journal of Radioprotection Research. 2013;1:10–13. doi: 10.12966/jrr.08.02.2013. - DOI
    1. Khan FM. The physics of radiation therapy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

LinkOut - more resources