Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Oct;88(4):807-816.
doi: 10.1002/ana.25844. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

Anticoagulation Timing in Cardioembolic Stroke and Recurrent Event Risk

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Anticoagulation Timing in Cardioembolic Stroke and Recurrent Event Risk

Shadi Yaghi et al. Ann Neurol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Guidelines recommend initiating anticoagulation within 4 to 14 days after cardioembolic stroke. Data supporting this did not account for key factors potentially affecting the decision to initiate anticoagulation, such as infarct size, hemorrhagic transformation, or high-risk features on echocardiography.

Methods: We pooled data from stroke registries of 8 comprehensive stroke centers across the United States. We included consecutive patients admitted with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation. The primary predictor was timing of initiating anticoagulation (0-3 days, 4-14 days, or >14 days), and outcomes were recurrent stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and major extracranial hemorrhage (ECH) within 90 days.

Results: Among 2,084 patients, 1,289 met the inclusion criteria. The combined endpoint occurred in 10.1% (n = 130) subjects (87 ischemic events, 20 sICH, and 29 ECH). Overall, there was no significant difference in the composite endpoint between the 3 groups (0-3 days: 10.3%, 64/617; 4-14 days: 9.7%, 52/535; >14 days: 10.2%, 14/137; p = 0.933). In adjusted models, patients started on anticoagulation between 4 and 14 days did not have a lower rate of sICH (vs 0-3 days; odds ratio [OR] = 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50-4.43), nor did they have a lower rate of recurrent ischemic events (vs >14 days; OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.36-1.62, p = 0.482).

Interpretation: In this multicenter real-world cohort, the recommended (4-14 days) time frame to start oral anticoagulation was not associated with reduced ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes. Randomized trials are required to determine the optimal timing of anticoagulation initiation. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:807-816.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflict of interest: all authors have no relevant conflict of interest

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Study flow chart
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Kaplan Meier survival analysis of time to start anticoagulation categories versus recurrent ischemic event (A), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic (B), and combined events (C).

References

    1. Kamel H, Healey JS. Cardioembolic stroke. Circulation research. 2017;120:514–526 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sacchetti DC, Furie KL, Yaghi S. Cardioembolic stroke: Mechanisms and therapeutics. Seminars in neurology. 2017;37:326–338 - PubMed
    1. Low molecular weight heparinoid, org 10172 (danaparoid), and outcome after acute ischemic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. The publications committee for the trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment (toast) investigators. Jama. 1998;279:1265–1272 - PubMed
    1. Berge E, Abdelnoor M, Nakstad PH, Sandset PM. Low molecular-weight heparin versus aspirin in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: A double-blind randomised study. Haest study group. Heparin in acute embolic stroke trial. Lancet (London, England). 2000;355:1205–1210 - PubMed
    1. The international stroke trial (ist): A randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. International stroke trial collaborative group. Lancet (London, England). 1997;349:1569–1581 - PubMed

Publication types