Correspondence
- PMID: 32658161
- DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002884
Correspondence
Comment in
-
Reply.Retina. 2020 Sep;40(9):e48-e49. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002883. Retina. 2020. PMID: 32658165 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
FIRST FAILED MACULAR HOLE SURGERY OR REOPENING OF A PREVIOUSLY CLOSED HOLE: Do We Gain by Reoperating?-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Retina. 2020 Jan;40(1):1-15. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002564. Retina. 2020. PMID: 31335482 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reid GA, McDonagh N, Wright DM, et al. First failed macular hole surgery or reopening of a previously closed hole: do we gain by reoperating?—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Retina 2020;40:1–15.
-
- D'Souza MJJ, Chaudhary V, Devenyi R, et al. Re-operation of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes after initial surgery with internal limiting membrane peel. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:1564–1567.
-
- Haritoglou C, Sebag J. Indications and considerations for chromodissection. Retin Physician 2014;11:34–39.
-
- Halfter W, Sebag J, Cunningham ET. Vitreo-retinal interface and inner limiting membrane. In: Sebag J, eds. Vitreous—in Health & Disease. New York, NY: Springer; 2014:165–192.
-
- Pan BX, Yee KM, Ross-Cisneros FN, et al. Inner retinal optic neuropathy: vitreomacular surgery-associated disruption of the inner retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:6756–6764.