Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2020 Jul 21;6(3):e20737.
doi: 10.2196/20737.

Belief in a COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory as a Predictor of Mental Health and Well-Being of Health Care Workers in Ecuador: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Xi Chen  1 , Stephen X Zhang  2 , Asghar Afshar Jahanshahi  3 , Aldo Alvarez-Risco  4 , Huiyang Dai  5 , Jizhen Li  5 , Verónica García Ibarra  6
Affiliations
Comment

Belief in a COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory as a Predictor of Mental Health and Well-Being of Health Care Workers in Ecuador: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Xi Chen et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Background: During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, social media platforms have become active sites for the dissemination of conspiracy theories that provide alternative explanations of the cause of the pandemic, such as secret plots by powerful and malicious groups. However, the association of individuals' beliefs in conspiracy theories about COVID-19 with mental health and well-being issues has not been investigated. This association creates an assessable channel to identify and provide assistance to people with mental health and well-being issues during the pandemic.

Objective: Our aim was to provide the first evidence that belief in conspiracy theories regarding the COVID-19 pandemic is a predictor of the mental health and well-being of health care workers.

Methods: We conducted a survey of 252 health care workers in Ecuador from April 10 to May 2, 2020. We analyzed the data regarding distress and anxiety caseness with logistic regression and the data regarding life and job satisfaction with linear regression.

Results: Among the 252 sampled health care workers in Ecuador, 61 (24.2%) believed that the virus was developed intentionally in a lab; 82 (32.5%) experienced psychological distress, and 71 (28.2%) had anxiety disorder. Compared to health care workers who were not sure where the virus originated, those who believed the virus was developed intentionally in a lab were more likely to report psychological distress and anxiety disorder and to have lower levels of job satisfaction and life satisfaction.

Conclusions: This paper identifies belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories as an important predictor of distress, anxiety, and job and life satisfaction among health care workers. This finding will enable mental health services to better target and provide help to mentally vulnerable health care workers during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: 2019-nCoV; COVID-19; Latin America; conspiracy; coronavirus; health care worker; mental health; prediction; psychiatric identification; social media; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Comment on

  • The concomitants of conspiracy concerns.
    Freeman D, Bentall RP. Freeman D, et al. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 May;52(5):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1354-4. Epub 2017 Mar 29. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28352955 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Douglas KM, Sutton RM. Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2018 Nov 29;29(1):256–298. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428. - DOI
    1. Ahmad AR, Murad HR. The Impact of Social Media on Panic During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: Online Questionnaire Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 19;22(5):e19556. doi: 10.2196/19556. https://www.jmir.org/2020/5/e19556/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bavel J, Baicker K, Boggio PS, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M, Crockett MJ, Crum AJ, Douglas KM, Druckman JN, Drury J, Dube O, Ellemers N, Finkel EJ, Fowler JH, Gelfand M, Han S, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Kitayama S, Mobbs D, Napper LE, Packer DJ, Pennycook G, Peters E, Petty RE, Rand DG, Reicher SD, Schnall S, Shariff A, Skitka LJ, Smith SS, Sunstein CR, Tabri N, Tucker JA, van der Linden S, van Lange P, Weeden KA, Wohl MJA, Zaki J, Zion SR, Willer R. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460–471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Del Vicario M, Bessi A, Zollo F, Petroni F, Scala A, Caldarelli G, Stanley HE, Quattrociocchi W. The spreading of misinformation online. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):554–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517441113. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=26729863 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freeman D, Waite F, Rosebrock L, Petit A, Causier C, East A, Jenner L, Teale A, Carr L, Mulhall S, Bold E, Lambe S. Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychol Med. 2020 May 21;:1–13. doi: 10.1017/s0033291720001890. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types