Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;27(13):4970-4979.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08845-4. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

Robotic Major Hepatectomy: An Institutional Experience and Clinical Outcomes

Affiliations

Robotic Major Hepatectomy: An Institutional Experience and Clinical Outcomes

Iswanto Sucandy et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Most of the literature has only reported outcomes on robotic minor non-anatomical hepatectomy. This study was undertaken to analyze and examine the safety, feasibly, and perioperative outcomes of robotic major hepatectomy at our institution.

Methods: All patients undergoing robotic major hepatectomy were prospectively followed. Major hepatectomy was defined as a resection of 3 or more segments. Data are expressed as median (mean ± SD).

Results: A total of 170 consecutive patients underwent robotic hepatectomies, of which 100 were major resections involving at least 3 segments. The 100 patients were of median 62 (61 ± 13.0) years, and 46% were women. Median BMI was 29 (29 ± 5.9) kg/m2 and median ASA class was 3 (3 ± 0.5). Thirty percent of robotic major hepatectomies were for hepatocellular carcinoma, 28% were for metastatic adenocarcinoma, 9% were for cholangiocarcinoma, and 5% were for metastatic neuroendocrine tumor. Prep time (in the room until incision) was a median 58 min (62 ± 18.4), extraction time (incision until specimen extraction) was 124 min (146 ± 99.5), console time was 198 min (210 ± 123.9), closure time (extraction until dressing placement) was 109 min (131 ± 93.8), operative duration was 246 min (269 ± 123.2), and time under anesthesia was 330 min (353 ± 109.6). Estimated blood loss was 175 ml (249 ± 275.9) and length of stay was 4 days (5 ± 4.3). Seven patients experienced postoperative complications. Thirteen patients were readmitted within 30 days, and one patient died within 30 days.

Conclusion: Application of the robotic platform to major hepatectomy is safe and feasible. Our early experience shows that this minimally invasive approach results in excellent short-term outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sucandy I, Gravetz A, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. Technique of robotic left hepatectomy: how we approach it. J Robotic Surg. 2019;13(2):201–7. - DOI
    1. Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc. 1992; 6:99.
    1. Fretland ÅA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjørnelv GM, Kazaryan AM, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, Hausken J, Tønnessen TI, Abildgaard A, Barkhatov L, Yaqub S. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2018; 267:199–207. - DOI
    1. Sucandy I, Schlosser S, Bourdeau T, Spence J, Attili A, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. Robotic hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors. J Robotic Surg. 2020; 14: 75–80. - DOI
    1. Boggi U, Caniglia F, Amorese G. Laparoscopic robot-assisted major hepatectomy. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 2014; 21:3–10. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources