The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
- PMID: 32663096
- PMCID: PMC7430098
- DOI: 10.1177/0271678X20943823
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
Abstract
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the "ARRIVE Essential 10," which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the "Recommended Set," which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.
Republished from
-
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 14;18(7):e3000410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410. eCollection 2020 Jul. PLoS Biol. 2020. PMID: 32663219 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Goodman SN, Fanelli D, Ioannidis JPA.What does research reproducibility mean? Science translational medicine 2016; 8(341): 341ps12. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027. - PubMed
-
- Begley CG, Ioannidis JP.Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circ Res 2015; 116(1): 116–126. Epub 2015/01/02. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819. PubMed PMID: 25552691. - PubMed
-
- Kidwell MC, Lazarevic LB, Baranski E, Hardwicke TE, Piechowski S, Falkenberg LS, et al.. Badges to acknowledge open practices: a simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biol 2016; 14(5): e1002456. Epub 2016/05/14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456. PubMed PMID: 27171007; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4865119. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Else H.Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions. Nature 2018; 561(7721): 17–18. Epub 2018/09/06. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06178-7. PubMed PMID: 30181639. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources