Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 26;22(8):e17667.
doi: 10.2196/17667.

Perceptions and Experiences of Internet-Based Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research

Tommer Spence  1 , Inès Kander  1 , Julia Walsh  1 , Frances Griffiths  1 , Jonathan Ross  2
Affiliations

Perceptions and Experiences of Internet-Based Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research

Tommer Spence et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Internet-based testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) allows asymptomatic individuals to order a self-sampling kit online and receive their results electronically, reducing the need to attend a clinic unless for treatment. This approach has become increasingly common; however, there is evidence that barriers exist to accessing it, particularly among some high-risk populations. We review the qualitative evidence on this topic, as qualitative research is well-placed to identify the complex influences that relate to accessing testing.

Objective: This paper aims to explore perceptions and experiences of internet-based testing for STIs among users and potential users.

Methods: Searches were run through 5 electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) to identify peer-reviewed studies published between 2005 and 2018. Search terms were drawn from 4 categories: STIs, testing or screening, digital health, and qualitative methods. Included studies were conducted in high-income countries and explored patient perceptions or experiences of internet-based testing, and data underwent thematic synthesis.

Results: A total of 11 studies from the 1735 studies identified in the initial search were included in the review. The synthesis identified that internet-based testing is viewed widely as being acceptable and is preferred over clinic testing by many individuals due to perceived convenience and anonymity. However, a number of studies identified concerns relating to test accuracy and lack of communication with practitioners, particularly when receiving results. There was a lack of consensus on preferred media for results delivery, although convenience and confidentiality were again strong influencing factors. The majority of included studies were limited by the fact that they researched hypothetical services.

Conclusions: Internet-based testing providers may benefit from emphasizing this testing's comparative convenience and privacy compared with face-to-face testing in order to improve uptake, as well as alleviating concerns about the self-sampling process. There is a clear need for further research exploring in depth the perceptions and experiences of people who have accessed internet-based testing and for research on internet-based testing that explicitly gathers the views of populations that are at high risk of STIs.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42019146938; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=146938.

Keywords: digital health; eHealth; internet; qualitative research; screening; self-sampling; sexually transmitted infections; testing; thematic synthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: JR reports personal fees from GSK Pharma, Mycovia, and Nabriva Therapeutics, as well as ownership of shares in GSK Pharma and AstraZeneca Pharma; is author of the UK and European Guidelines on Pelvic Inflammatory Disease; and is a member of the European Sexually Transmitted Infections Guidelines Editorial Board and the National Institute for Health Research Funding Committee (Health Technology Assessment Programme). He is an NIHR Journals editor and associate editor of Sexually Transmitted Infections journal. He is an officer of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (treasurer) and a charity trustee of the Sexually Transmitted Infections Research Foundation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of literature search process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Critical appraisal of included studies according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2017. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2018. [2020-08-17]. https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/2017-STD-Surveillance-Report_CDC-clearan....
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia’s health 2018. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018. [2020-08-17]. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/7c42913d-295f-4bc9-9c24-4e44eff4a04a/ai....
    1. Public Health England Sexually transmitted infections and screening for chlamydia in England, 2018. 2019. [2020-08-17]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa....
    1. Public Health England Addressing the increase in syphilis in England: PHE Action Plan. 2019. [2020-08-17]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa....
    1. Unemo M, Shafer WM. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: past, evolution, and future. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Jul;27(3):587–613. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00010-14. http://cmr.asm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=24982323 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types