Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 14;15(7):e0235466.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235466. eCollection 2020.

Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona

Affiliations

Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona

Jordi Gómez I Prat et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Chagas disease presents bio-psycho-social and cultural determinants for infected patients, their family members, close friends, and society. For this reason, diagnosis and treatment require an active approach and an integral focus, so that we can prevent the disease from creating stigma and exclusion, as is actively promoting access to diagnosis, medical attention and social integration.

Methodology: The study was conducted in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) from 2004 to 2017. After an increased detection rates of CHD in our region, the process of construction of community strategies started (2004-2013). Different community interventions with informational, educational, and communication components were designed, developed, implemented, and evaluated. The results of the evaluation helped to determine which intervention should be prioritized: 1) workshop; 2) community event; 3) in situ screening. Afterwards, those strategies were implemented (2014-2017).

Results: Each of the three strategies resulted in a different level of coverage, or number of people reached. The in situ screening interventions reached the highest coverage (956 persons, 58.98%).Clear differences exist (p-value<0.001) between the three strategies regarding the percentage of screenings and diagnoses carried out. The largest number was in the in situ screening intervention, with a total of 830 persons screened despite the greatest number of diagnoses was among the workshop participants (33 persons, 20.75% of those screened). The prevalence of infection found is similar among the three strategies, ranging from 16.63% to 22.32% of the screened patients (p-value = 0.325).

Conclusions: The results of the study show that community interventions seem to be necessary to improve access to diagnosis and treatment of CHD in the area of Barcelona. They also show which strategy is the most appropriate based on the detected needs of the community, the proposed objectives of the intervention, and the given socio-temporal context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

NO authors have competing interests.

References

    1. World Health Organization, Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases. Integrating neglected tropical diseases into global health and development: fourth WHO report on neglected tropical diseases. 2017.
    1. Coura JR, Viñas PA. Chagas disease: a new worldwide challenge. Nature. 2010. June;465(S7301):S6–7. - PubMed
    1. Basile L, Jansà JM, Carlier Y, Salamanca DD, Angheben A, Bartoloni A, et al. Chagas disease in European countries: the challenge of a surveillance system. Eurosurveillance, 16(37), 19968 - PubMed
    1. Uchôa E, Firmo JOA, Dias EC, Pereira MSN, Gontijo ECD. Signs, meanings, and actions associated with Chagas disease. Cad Saude Publica. 2002;18(1):71–9. 10.1590/s0102-311x2002000100008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avaria Saavedra A, Gómez i Prat J. "Si tengo chagas es mejor que me muera”. El desafío de incorporar una aproximación sociocultural a la atención de personas afectadas por Enfermedad de Chagas. Enfermedades Emerg. 2008;10(S1):40–5.

Publication types