Inequalities in caesarean section in Burundi: evidence from the Burundi Demographic and Health Surveys (2010-2016)
- PMID: 32664936
- PMCID: PMC7359587
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05516-8
Inequalities in caesarean section in Burundi: evidence from the Burundi Demographic and Health Surveys (2010-2016)
Abstract
Background: Despite caesarean section (CS) being a lifesaving intervention, there is a noticeable gap in providing this service, when necessary, between different population groups within a country. In Burundi, there is little information about CS coverage inequality and the change in provision of this service over time. Using a high-quality equity analysis approach, we aimed to document both magnitude and change of inequality in CS coverage in Burundi over 7 years to investigate disparities.
Methods: For this study, data were extracted from the 2010 and 2016 Burundi Demographic and Health Surveys (BDHS) and analyzed through the recently updated Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) of the World Health Organization. CS delivery was disaggregated by four equity stratifiers, namely education, wealth, residence and sub-national region. For each equity stratifier, relative and absolute summary measures were calculated. We built a 95% uncertainty interval around the point estimate to determine statistical significance.
Main findings: Disparity in CS was present in both survey years and increased over time. The disparity systematically favored wealthy women (SII = 10.53, 95% UI; 8.97, 12.10), women who were more educated (PAR = 8.89, 95% UI; 8.51, 9.26), women living in urban areas (D = 12.32, 95% UI; 9.00, 15.63) and some regions such as Bujumbura (PAR = 11.27, 95% UI; 10.52, 12.02).
Conclusions: Burundi had not recorded any progress in ensuring equity regarding CS coverage between 2010 and 2016. It is important to launch interventions that promote justified use of CS among all subpopulations and discourage overuse among high income, more educated women and urban dwellers.
Keywords: Burundi; Caesarean section; DHS; Global health; Inequality.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Similar articles
-
Magnitude and trends in socio-economic and geographic inequality in access to birth by cesarean section in Tanzania: evidence from five rounds of Tanzania demographic and health surveys (1996-2015).Arch Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;78:80. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00466-3. eCollection 2020. Arch Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32944238 Free PMC article.
-
Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 11;20(1):1222. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09297-x. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32781997 Free PMC article.
-
Inequalities in prevalence of birth by caesarean section in Ghana from 1998-2014.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 22;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04378-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35065625 Free PMC article.
-
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7. Lancet. 2018. PMID: 30322584 Review.
-
A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland.BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 19;21(1):1705. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11717-5. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34538235 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo: a systematic review.Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Dec 5;5:1412403. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1412403. eCollection 2024. Front Glob Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 39703717 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing geographical and economic inequalities in caesarean section rates between the districts of Bihar, India: a secondary analysis of the National Family Health Survey.BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e055326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055326. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 34992116 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial distribution and predictive factors of antenatal care in Burundi: A spatial and multilevel baseline analysis for the third burundian demographic and health survey.PLoS One. 2023 Jan 17;18(1):e0272897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272897. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36649240 Free PMC article.
-
Caesarean section in Sudan: findings from nationwide household surveys on rates, trends, and geographic and sociodemographic variability.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04995-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 36127631 Free PMC article.
-
Inequality in Utilization of Maternal Healthcare Services in Low‑ and Middle‑Income Countries: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Matern Child Health J. 2025 Jun;29(6):741-766. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04111-9. Epub 2025 Jun 3. Matern Child Health J. 2025. PMID: 40461773 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization, UNFPA, UNICEF, AMDD. Monitoring emergency obstetric care:a handbook. Geneva: WHO; 2009. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241547734_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed on 29 Apr 2020.
-
- Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–1383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3. - DOI - PubMed
-
- WHO. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Every effort should be made to provide caesarean sections to women in need, rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Accessed 18 Oct 2019.
-
- Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet. 2010 ;375(9713):490–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous