A stochastic agent-based model of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in France
- PMID: 32665655
- DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1001-6
A stochastic agent-based model of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in France
Erratum in
-
Author Correction: A stochastic agent-based model of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in France.Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1801. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1129-4. Nat Med. 2020. PMID: 33067584 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Many European countries have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic by implementing nationwide protection measures and lockdowns1. However, the epidemic could rebound when such measures are relaxed, possibly leading to a requirement for a second or more, repeated lockdowns2. Here, we present results of a stochastic agent-based microsimulation model of the COVID-19 epidemic in France. We examined the potential impact of post-lockdown measures, including physical distancing, mask-wearing and shielding individuals who are the most vulnerable to severe COVID-19 infection, on cumulative disease incidence and mortality, and on intensive care unit (ICU)-bed occupancy. While lockdown is effective in containing the viral spread, once lifted, regardless of duration, it would be unlikely to prevent a rebound. Both physical distancing and mask-wearing, although effective in slowing the epidemic and in reducing mortality, would also be ineffective in ultimately preventing ICUs from becoming overwhelmed and a subsequent second lockdown. However, these measures coupled with the shielding of vulnerable people would be associated with better outcomes, including lower mortality and maintaining an adequate ICU capacity to prevent a second lockdown. Benefits would nonetheless be markedly reduced if most people do not adhere to these measures, or if they are not maintained for a sufficiently long period.
Update of
-
Lockdown exit strategies and risk of a second epidemic peak: a stochastic agent-based model of SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in France.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2020 May 5:2020.04.30.20086264. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.30.20086264. medRxiv. 2020. Update in: Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1417-1421. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1001-6. PMID: 32511469 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
References
-
- Bootsma, M. C. & Ferguson, N. M. The effect of public health measures on the 1918 influenza pandemic in US cities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7588–7593 (2007). - DOI
-
- Adam, D. Special report: the simulations driving the world’s response to COVID-19. Nature 580, 316–318 (2020). - DOI
-
- Salje, H. et al. Estimating the burden of SARS-CoV-2 in France. Science 369, 208–211 (2020). - DOI
-
- Nicola, M. et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int. J. Surg. 78, 185–193 (2020). - DOI
-
- Brooks, S. K. et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 395, 912–920 (2020). - DOI