Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;22(10):1653-1666.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0862-x. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

Polygenic risk scores and breast and epithelial ovarian cancer risks for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants

Daniel R Barnes  1 Matti A Rookus  2 Lesley McGuffog  3 Goska Leslie  3 Thea M Mooij  2 Joe Dennis  3 Nasim Mavaddat  3 Julian Adlard  4 Munaza Ahmed  5 Kristiina Aittomäki  6 Nadine Andrieu  7   8   9   10 Irene L Andrulis  11   12 Norbert Arnold  13   14 Banu K Arun  15 Jacopo Azzollini  16 Judith Balmaña  17   18 Rosa B Barkardottir  19   20 Daniel Barrowdale  3 Javier Benitez  21   22 Pascaline Berthet  23 Katarzyna Białkowska  24 Amie M Blanco  25 Marinus J Blok  26 Bernardo Bonanni  27 Susanne E Boonen  28 Åke Borg  29 Aniko Bozsik  30 Angela R Bradbury  31 Paul Brennan  32 Carole Brewer  33 Joan Brunet  34 Saundra S Buys  35 Trinidad Caldés  36 Maria A Caligo  37 Ian Campbell  38   39 Lise Lotte Christensen  40 Wendy K Chung  41 Kathleen B M Claes  42 Chrystelle Colas  43 GEMO Study CollaboratorsEMBRACE CollaboratorsMarie-Agnès Collonge-Rame  44 Jackie Cook  45 Mary B Daly  46 Rosemarie Davidson  47 Miguel de la Hoya  36 Robin de Putter  42 Capucine Delnatte  48 Peter Devilee  49   50 Orland Diez  51   52 Yuan Chun Ding  53 Susan M Domchek  54 Cecilia M Dorfling  55 Martine Dumont  56 Ros Eeles  57 Bent Ejlertsen  58 Christoph Engel  59 D Gareth Evans  60   61 Laurence Faivre  62   63 Lenka Foretova  64 Florentia Fostira  65 Michael Friedlander  66 Eitan Friedman  67   68 Debra Frost  3 Patricia A Ganz  69 Judy Garber  70 Andrea Gehrig  71 Anne-Marie Gerdes  72 Paul Gesta  73 Sophie Giraud  74 Gord Glendon  11 Andrew K Godwin  75 David E Goldgar  76 Anna González-Neira  22 Mark H Greene  77 Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich  78 Eric Hahnen  79   80 Ute Hamann  81 Helen Hanson  82 Julia Hentschel  83 Frans B L Hogervorst  84 Maartje J Hooning  85 Judit Horvath  86 Chunling Hu  87 Peter J Hulick  88   89 Evgeny N Imyanitov  90 kConFab InvestigatorsHEBON InvestigatorsGENEPSO InvestigatorsClaudine Isaacs  91 Louise Izatt  92 Angel Izquierdo  34 Anna Jakubowska  24   93 Paul A James  39   94 Ramunas Janavicius  95   96 Esther M John  97 Vijai Joseph  98 Beth Y Karlan  99   100 Karin Kast  101 Marco Koudijs  102 Torben A Kruse  103 Ava Kwong  104   105   106 Yael Laitman  67 Christine Lasset  107   108 Conxi Lazaro  34 Jenny Lester  99   100 Fabienne Lesueur  7   8   9   10 Annelie Liljegren  109 Jennifer T Loud  77 Jan Lubiński  24 Phuong L Mai  110 Siranoush Manoukian  16 Véronique Mari  111 Noura Mebirouk  7   8   9   10 Hanne E J Meijers-Heijboer  112 Alfons Meindl  113 Arjen R Mensenkamp  114 Austin Miller  115 Marco Montagna  116 Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme  43 Semanti Mukherjee  117 Anna Marie Mulligan  118   119 Katherine L Nathanson  54 Susan L Neuhausen  53 Heli Nevanlinna  120 Dieter Niederacher  121 Finn Cilius Nielsen  122 Liene Nikitina-Zake  123 Catherine Noguès  124 Edith Olah  30 Olufunmilayo I Olopade  125 Kai-Ren Ong  126 Aoife O'Shaughnessy-Kirwan  127 Ana Osorio  21   22 Claus-Eric Ott  128 Laura Papi  129 Sue K Park  130   131   132 Michael T Parsons  133 Inge Sokilde Pedersen  134   135   136 Bernard Peissel  16 Ana Peixoto  137 Paolo Peterlongo  138 Georg Pfeiler  139 Kelly-Anne Phillips  38   39   140   141 Karolina Prajzendanc  24 Miquel Angel Pujana  142 Paolo Radice  143 Juliane Ramser  144 Susan J Ramus  145   146   147 Johanna Rantala  148 Gad Rennert  149 Harvey A Risch  150 Mark Robson  117 Karina Rønlund  151 Ritu Salani  152 Hélène Schuster  153   154   155 Leigha Senter  156 Payal D Shah  31 Priyanka Sharma  157 Lucy E Side  158 Christian F Singer  139 Thomas P Slavin  159 Penny Soucy  56 Melissa C Southey  160   161   162 Amanda B Spurdle  133 Doris Steinemann  163 Zoe Steinsnyder  117 Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet  43   164   165 Christian Sutter  166 Yen Yen Tan  78 Manuel R Teixeira  137   167 Soo Hwang Teo  168   169 Darcy L Thull  170 Marc Tischkowitz  171   172 Silvia Tognazzo  116 Amanda E Toland  173 Alison H Trainer  94   174 Nadine Tung  175 Klaartje van Engelen  176 Elizabeth J van Rensburg  55 Ana Vega  21   177   178 Jeroen Vierstraete  42 Gabriel Wagner  139 Lisa Walker  179 Shan Wang-Gohrke  180 Barbara Wappenschmidt  79   80 Jeffrey N Weitzel  159 Siddhartha Yadav  181 Xin Yang  3 Drakoulis Yannoukakos  65 Dario Zimbalatti  16 Kenneth Offit  98   117 Mads Thomassen  103 Fergus J Couch  87 Rita K Schmutzler  79   80   182 Jacques Simard  56 Douglas F Easton  3   183 Georgia Chenevix-Trench  133 Antonis C Antoniou  3 Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA and BRCA2
Collaborators, Affiliations

Polygenic risk scores and breast and epithelial ovarian cancer risks for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants

Daniel R Barnes et al. Genet Med. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the associations between population-based polygenic risk scores (PRS) for breast (BC) or epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.

Methods: Retrospective cohort data on 18,935 BRCA1 and 12,339 BRCA2 female pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestry were available. Three versions of a 313 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) BC PRS were evaluated based on whether they predict overall, estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, or ER-positive BC, and two PRS for overall or high-grade serous EOC. Associations were validated in a prospective cohort.

Results: The ER-negative PRS showed the strongest association with BC risk for BRCA1 carriers (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation = 1.29 [95% CI 1.25-1.33], P = 3×10-72). For BRCA2, the strongest association was with overall BC PRS (HR = 1.31 [95% CI 1.27-1.36], P = 7×10-50). HR estimates decreased significantly with age and there was evidence for differences in associations by predicted variant effects on protein expression. The HR estimates were smaller than general population estimates. The high-grade serous PRS yielded the strongest associations with EOC risk for BRCA1 (HR = 1.32 [95% CI 1.25-1.40], P = 3×10-22) and BRCA2 (HR = 1.44 [95% CI 1.30-1.60], P = 4×10-12) carriers. The associations in the prospective cohort were similar.

Conclusion: Population-based PRS are strongly associated with BC and EOC risks for BRCA1/2 carriers and predict substantial absolute risk differences for women at PRS distribution extremes.

Keywords: BRCA1/2; PRS; breast cancer; genetics; ovarian cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

G.P. has received honoraria from Novartis, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Associations with specific polygenic risk score (PRS) percentiles.
The PRS percentile thresholds were determined in the sets of unaffected carriers for the disease under assessment. Table 2 shows the estimated hazard ratios (HRs). The black curve represents the expected HRs assuming the per standard deviation HR estimates in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers based on the continuous PRS models (Table 1). (a) PRSER- percentile-specific associations with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 carriers. The red curve represents the expected HRs over the PRS percentile distribution, assuming the per SD odds ratio (OR) estimate from the population-based validation studies from Mavaddat et al. (OR = 1.45 per PRSER- standard deviation). (b) PRSBC percentile-specific associations with breast cancer risk for BRCA2 carriers. The red curve represents the expected HRs over the PRS percentile distribution, assuming the per SD OR estimate from the population-based validation studies from Mavaddat et al. (OR = 1.61 per PRSBC standard deviation). (c) PRSHGS percentile-specific associations with ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 carriers. (d) PRSHGS percentile-specific associations with ovarian cancer risk for BRCA2 carriers. The gray curve (c and d only) represents the theoretical HRs across the PRS distribution, calculated by assuming external single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effect sizes and allele frequencies for SNPs contributing to the PRS. CI confidence interval, ER estrogen receptor, HGS high-grade serous.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Predicted absolute risks of developing breast and ovarian cancer by polygenic risk score (PRS) percentile.
Risks were calculated assuming the retrospective cohort hazard ratio (HR) estimates (Tables 1, 2). (a) Predicted absolute risks of developing breast cancer for BRCA1 carriers by percentiles of the PRSER-. (b) Predicted absolute risks of developing breast cancer for BRCA2 carriers by percentiles of the PRSBC. (c) Predicted absolute risks of developing ovarian cancer for BRCA1 carriers by the percentiles of the PRSHGS. (d) Predicted absolute risks of developing ovarian cancer for BRCA2 carriers by percentiles of the PRSHGS. ER estrogen receptor, HGS high-grade serous.

References

    1. Antoniou A, Pharoah PDP, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:1117–1130. doi: 10.1086/375033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017;317:2402–2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antoniou AC, Spurdle AB, Sinilnikova OM, et al. Common breast cancer-predisposition alleles are associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:937–948. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.02.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Couch FJ, Wang X, McGuffog L, et al. Genome-wide association study in BRCA1 mutation carriers identifies novel loci associated with breast and ovarian cancer risk. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003212. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gaudet MM, Kuchenbaecker KB, Vijai J, et al. Identification of a BRCA2-specific modifier locus at 6p24 related to breast cancer risk. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003173. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types