Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;34(10):1332-1339.
doi: 10.1177/0269216320942450. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

Complementary therapy in palliative care: A synthesis of qualitative and quantitative systematic reviews

Affiliations

Complementary therapy in palliative care: A synthesis of qualitative and quantitative systematic reviews

Megan Armstrong et al. Palliat Med. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Interventions delivered in palliative care are complex and their evaluation through qualitative and quantitative research can lead to contrasting results. In a systematic review of trials, the effectiveness results of complementary therapies in palliative care were inconclusive; however, our qualitative synthesis showed participants perceived them to be beneficial.

Aim: Use a novel methodology to synthesise evidence from qualitative and quantitative systematic reviews on complementary therapy in palliative care to explore the following: (1) If interventions delivered in trials reflect how participants in qualitative studies report they are delivered in real-life settings and (2) whether quality of life measures used in trials capture perceived benefits that are reported in qualitative studies.

Methods: Two matrix tables were formulated. In one, key components in delivery of the complementary therapy from the qualitative synthesis which are as follows: (1) relationship with therapist, (2) comfortable environment, (3) choices (e.g. area of massage) and (4) frequent sessions, were plotted against intervention description, to explore matches and mismatches. In the other, items included in quality of life scales were compared with perceived benefits of complementary therapy.

Results: None of the trials included all four key delivery components. The five quality of life scales used in the trials failed to capture the range of perceived benefits from the complementary therapies and many included inappropriate or redundant items.

Conclusions: By integrating qualitative and quantitative review data, we determined the reasons trials may be inconclusive. This methodological exemplar provides a framework for understanding complexity in outcomes across trials and a direction for future research.

Keywords: Complementary therapy; aromatherapy; massage; palliative; quality of life; reflexology; synthesis; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Verhoef M. Complementary and alternative approaches in palliative care: why are advanced cancer patients using them? Prog Palliat Care 2012; 20(5): 264–271.
    1. Candy B, Armstrong M, Flemming K, et al. The effectiveness of aromatherapy, massage and reflexology in people with palliative care needs: a systematic review. Palliat Med 2020; 34: 179–194. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong M, Flemming K, Kupeli N, et al. Aromatherapy, massage and reflexology: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of the perspectives from people with palliative care needs. Palliat Med 2019; 33(7): 757–769. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: a1655. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lobo MA, Kagan SH, Corrigan JD. Research design options for intervention studies. Pediatr Phys Ther 2017; 29: S57–S63. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types