Analytical and clinical validation of an ELISA for specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies
- PMID: 32667733
- PMCID: PMC7405491
- DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26303
Analytical and clinical validation of an ELISA for specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies
Abstract
The development of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serological tests is massive. The external validation of their performance is needed before use in clinical routine practice. Our study aims at assessing the analytical and clinical performance of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests detecting antibodies directed against the virus nucleocapsid protein: The NovaLisa SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin A (IgA), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) test (NovaTec) allowing a separate detection of each antibody and the Platelia SARS-CoV-2 Total Ab test (Bio-Rad) detecting total antibodies (IgM, IgA, and IgG). Two-hundred and eight coronavirus disease 2019 samples from 48 quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) confirmed patients were used to perform the sensitivity analysis. Non-SARS-CoV-2 sera (n = 79) with a potential cross-reaction to SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays were included in the specificity analysis. In addition, using receiver operator characteristic curves, adapted cut-off for improvement of the performances were proposed. The kinetics of these antibodies was also assessed over 8 weeks. Two weeks after the RT-qPCR positive detection, the NovaLisa test shows a sensitivity and specificity of 94.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.1%-98.6%) and 96.2% (95% CI: 89.4%-98.7%) for IgG, of 89.7% (95% CI: 76.4%-95.9%) and 98.7% (95% CI: 93.2%-98.8%) for IgA, and of 48.7% (95% CI: 33.9%-63.8%) and 98.7% (95% CI: 93.2%-99.8%) for IgM. With the Platelia system, the specificity and sensitivity were 97.4% (95% CI: 92.1%-99.7%) and 94.9% (95% CI: 87.7%-98.0%) for total antibodies using the adapted cut-offs. The NovaLisa and the Platelia tests have satisfactory analytical performances. The clinical performances are excellent for IgG, IgA, and total antibodies especially if the cut-off is optimized.
Keywords: COVID-19, ELISA; IgA; IgG; IgM; SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; kinetics.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Among the authors, Jonathan Douxfils is chief executive officer and founder of QUALIblood sa and reports personal fees from Diagnostica Stago, Roche, Roche Diagnostics, Daiichi‐Sankyo, and Portola, outside the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organisation . Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) and the virus that causes it; 2020. Technical guidance. Published online 2020. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technica...
-
- World Health Organisation . Coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic. Published online 2020. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-...
-
- John Hopkins University . Coronavirus resource center. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Published 2020. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed June 7, 2020.
-
- FindDx.org. SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnostic pipeline. FindDx. Published 2020. https://www.finddx.org/covid-19/pipeline/?avance=Commercialized&type=all.... Accessed June 7, 2020.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
