Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 13;56(7):344.
doi: 10.3390/medicina56070344.

Neurodevelopmental Aspects and Cortical Auditory Maturation in Children with Cochlear Implants

Affiliations

Neurodevelopmental Aspects and Cortical Auditory Maturation in Children with Cochlear Implants

Cristina Pantelemon et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and objectives: The cochlear implant is not only meant to restore auditory function, but it also has a series of benefits on the psychomotor development and on the maturation of central auditory pathways. In this study, with the help of neuropsychological tests and cortical auditory potentials (CAEPs), we intend to identify a series of instruments that allow us to monitor children with a cochlear implant, and later on, to admit them into an individualized rehabilitation program. Materials and methods: This is a longitudinal study containing 17 subjects (6 boys and 11 girls) diagnosed with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. The average age for cochlear implantation in our cohort is 22 months old. Each child was tested before the cochlear implantation, tested again 3 months after the implant, and then 6 months after the implant. To test the general development, we used the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST II). CAEPs were recorded to assess the maturation of central auditory pathways. Results: The results showed there was progress in both general development and language development, with a significant statistical difference between the overall DQ (developmental quotient) and language DQ before the cochlear implantation and three and six months later, respectively. Similarly, CAEP measurements revealed a decrease of positive-going component (P1) latency after cochlear implantation. Conclusion: CAEPs and neuropsychological tests prove to be useful instruments for monitoring the progress in patients with cochlear implants during the rehabilitation process.

Keywords: central auditory pathways; cochlear implantation; cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPSs); general development; hearing loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cortical auditory potential (CAEP) trace recording in a child at three time points: pre-implantation, at three months after cochlear implant, and six months after cochlear implant.

References

    1. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007;120:898–921. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2333. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sininger Y.S., Martinez A., Eisenberg L., Christensen E., Grimes A., Hu J. Newborn hearing screening speeds diagnosis and access to intervention by 20–25 months. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2009;20:49–57. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.1.5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moeller M.P. Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics. 2000;106:E43. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.3.e43. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Niparko J.K., Tobey E.A., Thal D.J., Eisenber L.S., Quittner A.L., Fink N.E., Wang N.-Y. Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. JAMA. 2010;303:1498–1506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.451. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wie O.B. Language development in children after receiving bilateral cochlear implants between 5 and 18 months. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74:1258–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.07.026. - DOI - PubMed